Difference between revisions of "Template talk:comic discussion"
(→New topic for testing purposes: new section) |
(Mention other discussion place) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Just testing what the TOC looks like... [[User:Markhurd|Mark Hurd]] ([[User talk:Markhurd|talk]]) 11:01, 14 April 2013 (UTC) | Just testing what the TOC looks like... [[User:Markhurd|Mark Hurd]] ([[User talk:Markhurd|talk]]) 11:01, 14 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | FYI I've mentioned my change to "add a topic!" [[explain xkcd:Community portal/Technical#I.27ve removed .22add a comment.21.22 from Discussion heading|here]] for a wider audience. [[User:Markhurd|Mark Hurd]] ([[User talk:Markhurd|talk]]) 11:33, 14 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:33, 14 April 2013
The template eats whitespace, compare Talk:1101: Sketchiness and 1101: Sketchiness. --Kronf (talk) 20:58, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
- Nope. In most cases it performs fine. Here's just a few examples:
- 1094: Interview vs. Talk:1094: Interview
- 1093: Forget vs. Talk:1093: Forget
- 1092: Michael Phelps vs. Talk:1092: Michael Phelps (last 2 comments)
- 1091: Curiosity vs. Talk:1091: Curiosity (at least the first 2 comments)
- 1090: Formal Languages vs. Talk:1090: Formal Languages
- etc.
- I don't know what is wrong with that talk page, but it appears to be happening only for that comic.
New topic for testing purposes
Just testing what the TOC looks like... Mark Hurd (talk) 11:01, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
FYI I've mentioned my change to "add a topic!" here for a wider audience. Mark Hurd (talk) 11:33, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
