# Talk:2641: Mouse Turbines

Is anybody going to try to calculate the amount of power such a turbine could collect? -- Dtgriscom (talk) 19:24, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Good idea; what should we use for an estimate of the geometry for https://www.omnicalculator.com/ecology/wind-turbine ? The final panel makes it look like the blade diameter is about twice the size of a fist. [1] says "exhaled air velocity varies from 2.2 m/s to 9.9 m/s (5.66 ± 1.57 m/s, mean ± SD) and exhalation time varies from 2.10 s to 8.21 s (4.42 ± 1.73s, mean ± SD)."
I guessed 10 cm radius and used that mean breath speed. I should have used the top 9.9 m/s though, shouldn't I? 172.70.214.185 20:56, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
After a closer look at that article, the mean is more appropriate. 172.70.206.95 21:19, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
I'm not sure how you'd judge that it's twice the size of a fist, given that stick people don't really have fists. I would assume that they're meant to be about the same size as dandelion heads - so about 3 or 4 cm (unless US dandelions are bigger than UK ones). They certainly look about that size in the second panel. You'd also need to factor in problems of interference, given the 'planting density' of these turbines, and the sub-optimal location surrounded by grasses, etc. 172.70.86.44 08:08, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
The rotating diameter is shown as about a third the height of Beret Guy's head, so it's definitely not 20 cm. 172.70.210.125 02:47, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Human head says the average "vertical distance from the bottom of the chin (menton) to the top of the head" is about 22 cm, so perhaps we should go with 8-10 cm turbines instead? There aren't going to be enough of those to even charge a mouse cellphone. 172.70.211.52 01:28, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Although these miniscule wind turbines don't generate much power, mice probably don't need much. Barmar (talk) 21:17, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

That's certainly a fair point. How much power would a mouse-sized fridge need? 172.70.206.95 21:23, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Mice consume a lot more food per body weight (especially for body heat because heat transfer scales with surface area, not mass/volume) than humans. Mouse-sized fridge efficiency would also be poor both because of the same size issue and reduced room for insulation. 627235 (talk) 11:13, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
A 480 ml insulin travel fridge uses 5 watts on a 3% duty cycle depending on the ambient temperature and how much it's loaded, so that's in the realm of possibility, and seems large enough. I used to feed lab mice about 5 grams of Purina Lab Rodent Chow daily, which was maybe 8ml volume, but it doesn't need to be refrigerated. Googling suggests field mice can get all the water they need from a diet of seeds. It seems to me that if mice could use electricity, they'd need it more in the winter than the summer. 172.70.211.52 22:01, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Someone please check my mouse energy needs math and assumptions. I made a couple misplaced decimal mistakes getting to where it is now, and I'm going to have another beer. 172.70.211.52 22:17, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Not sure about numbers but some (if not most) energy requirements scale by surface area (Square–cube law or other measurements. There are also efficiency issues with at least lots of human-made miniature machines. 627235 (talk) 11:13, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
What energy requirements scale by surface area? Pumping water, cooking, and refrigerating scales by mass. Converting footcandles to lumens depends on area, but that doesn't account for much lower mouse ceilings. 172.69.34.6 22:27, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Heat exchange is kind of a biggie a lot of things depend on. 627235 (talk) 12:30, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

I'm confused by the statement that smaller turbines are less "efficient". There's nothing about efficiency at that link. 172.70.114.43 22:33, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

The graph shows the ratio between size and output has risen from about half to 85%. What is a better term for this? I'm pretty sure one of the multiple definitions of efficiency is technically correct, but it can never hurt explaining better. 172.69.33.113 22:42, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Changed to "relative power output" but I'm not sure that captures the idea very well either. 172.69.33.113 22:44, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Well wind turbines may not scale down ideally but still better than nuclear power plants. I suspect those have fixed minimal size and it's pretty big. -- Hkmaly (talk) 23:32, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Apparently nuclear power can be "as small as a button cell" but mice are vulnerable to radioactive hazards, and haven't solved the waste disposal problem. 172.70.214.185 23:45, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Batteries based on radioactive decay (such as RTGs, thermionic cells, betavoltaic cells) are not nuclear power plants. That term specifically refers to power plants based on nuclear fission reactors. Zmatt (talk) 11:38, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Isn't the power output of a solar panel directly dependent on its size (and wether it's covered with snow, angle to the sun, clouds? And prolly something I'll think of as soon as I hit save).172.70.131.106 23:55, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Yes, but the power per size doesn't increase with size like wind turbines do. 172.69.33.63 00:01, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

What is the smallest Tesla Powerwall available for purchase? 172.70.206.163 02:00, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

You probably want an 18650 or similar cell, which are frequently discarded on the street and thus easily obtainable by mice. 172.69.33.171 03:02, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Why doesn't pico hydro have the same problems scaling down as wind? They're both fluid turbines. 172.70.214.185 02:24, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

For the same reasons that small fans have several vanes, but large wind turbines have only three. I remember reading something about the physics (it's a laminar versus turbulent thing) but I can't remember the details now. I'll update here if I can find it. 172.70.210.125 03:08, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Here's part of it, but doesn't really get to the heart of the matter. 172.70.210.125 03:10, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
I think it has more to do with the relative magnitude of drag in gases instead of liquids. I don't have a good source though. 172.70.211.36 03:21, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Turbine efficiency (especially for very small turbines) mostly depends on pressure differential and mass throughput. Water has three orders of magnitude higher density than air. Also, even with just a meter of water column, water offers a 10 kPa pressure differential while you only rarely get that much of a pressure differential in air (at the same height) even between areas of high and low pressure usually at least dozens (and commonly hundreds) of miles apart (there may be exceptions for things like tornadoes but good luck using their wind power), certainly not between the high and low pressure sides of a turbine. Efficiency in practice mostly depends on moved mass (of turbine blades, etc) compared to moved medium (water or air), friction (mount, generator, maybe a gearbox) compared to total power input and (if electricity is desired) generator efficiency which itself depends on generator size and rotation speed (hence the need for a gearbox). For a very small turbine, all those things would need to be extremely light as well. 627235 (talk) 11:13, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Who is Beret Guy telling to make a wish - Megan or the mice? -- Ken g6 (talk) 04:48, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

I must tell you about NIMH. - 172.70.254.81 16:13, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Sometimes the explanation is funnier than the comic. 172.68.133.159 03:28, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Uh, what happened to the image!? Does anyone know how to fix it? 172.70.110.65 20:22, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Uhhhh, I read the book as a kid, it was called The Secret Of NIMH, just like the movie... At least, my copy... NiceGuy1 (talk) 04:26, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

That could have been a novel-of-the-film or named-for-the-film more obvious tie-in. They had to change "Mrs. Frisby" to "Brisby" in that, anyway, because of the potential infringement upon the "frisbee" name, so while they were reskinning it with "Now a major motion picture!!!" or whatever, then why not..? 141.101.99.8 12:06, 9 July 2022 (UTC)