Difference between revisions of "Talk:145: Parody Week: Dinosaur Comics"
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Lolol. This one is kinda funny. But why are dinos in full color? [[Special:Contributions/172.68.34.61|172.68.34.61]] 14:51, 20 March 2024 (UTC) | Lolol. This one is kinda funny. But why are dinos in full color? [[Special:Contributions/172.68.34.61|172.68.34.61]] 14:51, 20 March 2024 (UTC) | ||
:Because {{w|Dinosaur Comics}} is, and this is a full parody of that..? [[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.173|172.70.90.173]] 15:37, 20 March 2024 (UTC) | :Because {{w|Dinosaur Comics}} is, and this is a full parody of that..? [[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.173|172.70.90.173]] 15:37, 20 March 2024 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Gotcha. I get it now. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.174.4|162.158.174.4]] 18:28, 21 March 2024 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:28, 21 March 2024
The word "bicurious" has also been referenced in Dinosaur Comics: [1] [2] 199.27.128.116 00:27, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
The paragraph saying Randall is unfamiliar w/ genderqueer pronouns seems mistaken to me. He doesn't delve into a discussion of the different shades of meaning there, sure, but I think that's a stylistic choice consistent with making a readable comic --172.69.22.104 02:15, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
I think this page needs to be updated, as you don't need to be genderqueer to use neopronouns. Anyone can use whatever pronouns they want, and I don't agree that the definition of genderqueer on this page is the best one. In fact, the large majority of people who use neopronouns identify as non-binary, and this is seeming to show it's age.
Lolol. This one is kinda funny. But why are dinos in full color? 172.68.34.61 14:51, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Because Dinosaur Comics is, and this is a full parody of that..? 172.70.90.173 15:37, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Gotcha. I get it now. 162.158.174.4 18:28, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
