Difference between revisions of "Talk:3012: The Future of Orion"
(Comment) |
(Comment) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
"There are no dinosaur constellations, because dinosaur fossils had not yet been discovered when constellations were first being named in around 3000 BCE." Faulty logic, compare: "There are no microscope constellations, because microscopes had not yet been discovered when constellations were first being named in around 3000 BCE." [[Special:Contributions/162.158.154.221|162.158.154.221]] 20:03, 15 November 2024 (UTC) | "There are no dinosaur constellations, because dinosaur fossils had not yet been discovered when constellations were first being named in around 3000 BCE." Faulty logic, compare: "There are no microscope constellations, because microscopes had not yet been discovered when constellations were first being named in around 3000 BCE." [[Special:Contributions/162.158.154.221|162.158.154.221]] 20:03, 15 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
: {{w|Microscopium|link}}. Besides, weren't legends about dragons blamed on people finding dinosaur bones? -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 21:48, 15 November 2024 (UTC) | : {{w|Microscopium|link}}. Besides, weren't legends about dragons blamed on people finding dinosaur bones? -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 21:48, 15 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Besides, Microscopium isn't even 300 years old, much less 5000 [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.113|108.162.245.113]] | ||
Has anyone figured out how far in the future Randall has projected the new star positions? [[Special:Contributions/172.69.135.5|172.69.135.5]] 21:04, 15 November 2024 (UTC) | Has anyone figured out how far in the future Randall has projected the new star positions? [[Special:Contributions/172.69.135.5|172.69.135.5]] 21:04, 15 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
There ARE dinosaur constellations, [[1211: Birds and Dinosaurs|nine of them in fact]] [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.113|108.162.245.113]] | There ARE dinosaur constellations, [[1211: Birds and Dinosaurs|nine of them in fact]] [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.113|108.162.245.113]] | ||
Revision as of 21:53, 15 November 2024
this is my second first comment. -P?sych??otic?pot??at???o (talk) 17:47, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- This is my first second comment. 162.158.63.8 17:56, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- I plead the third. 172.69.136.188 19:57, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
okay we need to destroy the stars, any suggestions? Caliban (talk) 19:02, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Don't worry, the insects should take care of it. (If the rocks don't do it first) Trogdor147 (talk) 20:23, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Maybe add a reference to #1020? 172.71.147.100 19:43, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
now instead of a hunter with a dong, its a dinosaur with diarrhea! guess who (if you want to | what i have done) 19:47, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
"There are no dinosaur constellations, because dinosaur fossils had not yet been discovered when constellations were first being named in around 3000 BCE." Faulty logic, compare: "There are no microscope constellations, because microscopes had not yet been discovered when constellations were first being named in around 3000 BCE." 162.158.154.221 20:03, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- link. Besides, weren't legends about dragons blamed on people finding dinosaur bones? -- Hkmaly (talk) 21:48, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Besides, Microscopium isn't even 300 years old, much less 5000 108.162.245.113
Has anyone figured out how far in the future Randall has projected the new star positions? 172.69.135.5 21:04, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
There ARE dinosaur constellations, nine of them in fact 108.162.245.113
