Difference between revisions of "Talk:690: Semicontrolled Demolition"
Promethean (talk | contribs) m |
|||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
Even if the truth ''does'' always lie between the two extremes, how do we know it wasn't the South Tower that was the inside job? Then Cueball would be twice as wrong as the MSM (who were right about the North Tower) ''or'' the truthers (who were right about the South Tower). [[User:Promethean|Promethean]] ([[User talk:Promethean|talk]]) 23:21, 31 January 2015 (UTC) | Even if the truth ''does'' always lie between the two extremes, how do we know it wasn't the South Tower that was the inside job? Then Cueball would be twice as wrong as the MSM (who were right about the North Tower) ''or'' the truthers (who were right about the South Tower). [[User:Promethean|Promethean]] ([[User talk:Promethean|talk]]) 23:21, 31 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | Could the "between the two extremes" mean that the event actually happened mid-air, between the two towers? This, of course wouldn't make sense.--[[User:GuB|GuB]] ([[User talk:GuB|talk]]) 12:59, 14 September 2015 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 12:59, 14 September 2015
Sorry haven't posted before so probably doing this in the wrong way. The description says there's no video footage of the first plane, but there's a video taken of firefighters checking man hole covers who caught it. It's on you tube, but I didn't think it was right to post the link.
Edit: on second look I see a link has been put to second impact, so no reason not to post link to first:
[[1]]
86.150.177.79 09:58, 5 April 2013 (UTC) Bob
- Thanks for your input, and you're right! I corrected that in the explanation.
- You only "did this in the wrong way" in that you should have edited directly the explanation
. As on most wikis, the general motto here is Be bold: don't hesitate, just do it! - Thanks again - Cos (talk) 10:30, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Is it just me or is the bottom part of it blanked out for everyone? http://xkcd.com/690/ 203.104.11.12 12:26, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
- It seems as if it is censored. 203.104.11.11 05:52, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Unless an incomplete shows a specific lack, and I can't find one myself, I will delete the incomplete tag. Anonymous. 00:27, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Why was mention of the firefighter video removed/reverted and it states again that “there is no video of a plane flying into the north tower”? STEN (talk) 12:45, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Wouldn't the most extreme claim be that the entire collapse of the towers was faked? ...as in, they're still there, but with help from Copperfield, They hid it from everyone and created the whole media storm to distract from blah blah blah? Brettpeirce (talk) 20:48, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Even if the truth does always lie between the two extremes, how do we know it wasn't the South Tower that was the inside job? Then Cueball would be twice as wrong as the MSM (who were right about the North Tower) or the truthers (who were right about the South Tower). Promethean (talk) 23:21, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Could the "between the two extremes" mean that the event actually happened mid-air, between the two towers? This, of course wouldn't make sense.--GuB (talk) 12:59, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
