Difference between revisions of "User talk:Firestar233"
(→User and User Talk pages for IPs: new section) |
Firestar233 (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Now, '42' is maybe a bit keen to tidy up, and found that you seem to be active (or at least responded to a notification about the change to your Watched page, yes?), so rightfuly that should be reversed (the merits of tagging to delete other named users will depend upon the users themselves, there are occasional spam-only (or failed spam-only!) contributors that were given User-space pages by well-meaning others, who neither know nor care). But setting IP-specific pages to delete is entirely justified. If there are any significant contributions to these, they could probably be copied somewhere else first (pages of the most significant ''named'' contributor?), yet I generally doubt that'll be a realistic consideration, overall. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.163.111|172.70.163.111]] 12:23, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | Now, '42' is maybe a bit keen to tidy up, and found that you seem to be active (or at least responded to a notification about the change to your Watched page, yes?), so rightfuly that should be reversed (the merits of tagging to delete other named users will depend upon the users themselves, there are occasional spam-only (or failed spam-only!) contributors that were given User-space pages by well-meaning others, who neither know nor care). But setting IP-specific pages to delete is entirely justified. If there are any significant contributions to these, they could probably be copied somewhere else first (pages of the most significant ''named'' contributor?), yet I generally doubt that'll be a realistic consideration, overall. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.163.111|172.70.163.111]] 12:23, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| + | : If the pages were blank, then I might agree. I'm mostly undecided on deleting the IP addresses' user and talk pages, but ''registered'' users probably shouldn't have their pages be deleted even if they are blank. [[User:Firestar233|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233|if you desire conversing]] | [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233|what i have done]]) 21:31, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:31, 1 January 2025
but nobody came
User and User Talk pages for IPs
There really is no point to creating these for IP users (such as myself, yes), as they are not a practical/viable a means to contact a specific anonymous contributor, nor a useful 'home-page' for them to use.
Now, '42' is maybe a bit keen to tidy up, and found that you seem to be active (or at least responded to a notification about the change to your Watched page, yes?), so rightfuly that should be reversed (the merits of tagging to delete other named users will depend upon the users themselves, there are occasional spam-only (or failed spam-only!) contributors that were given User-space pages by well-meaning others, who neither know nor care). But setting IP-specific pages to delete is entirely justified. If there are any significant contributions to these, they could probably be copied somewhere else first (pages of the most significant named contributor?), yet I generally doubt that'll be a realistic consideration, overall. 172.70.163.111 12:23, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- If the pages were blank, then I might agree. I'm mostly undecided on deleting the IP addresses' user and talk pages, but registered users probably shouldn't have their pages be deleted even if they are blank. guess who (if you desire conversing | what i have done) 21:31, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
