Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Cursed Connectors"
(noinclude) |
(ββnoinclude) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== noinclude == | == noinclude == | ||
I think the noinclude tags are wrong (there are two "noinclude" tags but no "/noinclude" ones), but I don't know what's intended with them so it's hard to fix them. [[User:DKMell|DKMell]] ([[User talk:DKMell|talk]]) 20:29, 29 December 2025 (UTC) | I think the noinclude tags are wrong (there are two "noinclude" tags but no "/noinclude" ones), but I don't know what's intended with them so it's hard to fix them. [[User:DKMell|DKMell]] ([[User talk:DKMell|talk]]) 20:29, 29 December 2025 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I suspect that the first noinclude was intended to facilitate some transclusion of the initial category description into some other page(s)... Which ones, I'm not sure, without working out what "Special:What links to this page"-type query to use to save a bit of logical but potentially inconclusive manual searching of other page sources. | ||
| + | :As it currently is, the second noinclude should do nothing more given we're already "noincluding" by that point. So I removed that. | ||
| + | :If that was supposed to be an end-noinclude (i.e. start including things again, just before the end - which is going to add cats to pages that transclude this particular cat as text), then the lack of it clearly hasn't been noted as a problem. But you could also restore it with the added "/" and then check if that does something useful! [[Special:Contributions/82.132.246.87|82.132.246.87]] 03:27, 30 December 2025 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 03:27, 30 December 2025
noinclude[edit]
I think the noinclude tags are wrong (there are two "noinclude" tags but no "/noinclude" ones), but I don't know what's intended with them so it's hard to fix them. DKMell (talk) 20:29, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
- I suspect that the first noinclude was intended to facilitate some transclusion of the initial category description into some other page(s)... Which ones, I'm not sure, without working out what "Special:What links to this page"-type query to use to save a bit of logical but potentially inconclusive manual searching of other page sources.
- As it currently is, the second noinclude should do nothing more given we're already "noincluding" by that point. So I removed that.
- If that was supposed to be an end-noinclude (i.e. start including things again, just before the end - which is going to add cats to pages that transclude this particular cat as text), then the lack of it clearly hasn't been noted as a problem. But you could also restore it with the added "/" and then check if that does something useful! 82.132.246.87 03:27, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
