Difference between revisions of "Talk:3241: Horizontal Stabilizers"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 16: Line 16:
 
For those curious, an aircraft with one pair of wings is the aerodynamic equivalent of one pair of legs or wheels. It can work, but it requires careful considerations to keep it balanced. If a conventional aircraft loses its horizontal stabilizer, it will lose that balance and nose up or down uncontrollably. Aircraft that have no horizontal stabilizer usually use a method in which part of the main wing effectively functions in its place. [[User:RegularSizedGuy|RegularSizedGuy]] ([[User talk:RegularSizedGuy|talk]]) 21:01, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
 
For those curious, an aircraft with one pair of wings is the aerodynamic equivalent of one pair of legs or wheels. It can work, but it requires careful considerations to keep it balanced. If a conventional aircraft loses its horizontal stabilizer, it will lose that balance and nose up or down uncontrollably. Aircraft that have no horizontal stabilizer usually use a method in which part of the main wing effectively functions in its place. [[User:RegularSizedGuy|RegularSizedGuy]] ([[User talk:RegularSizedGuy|talk]]) 21:01, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
 
: I usually manage to use my legs without much careful consideration. [[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 08:39, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
 
: I usually manage to use my legs without much careful consideration. [[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 08:39, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
 +
:: The consideration is mostly during the design phase, and even then, there were some serious compromises made that cause cumulative problems with the legs, pelvis, spine, and internal organs. [[User:RegularSizedGuy|RegularSizedGuy]] ([[User talk:RegularSizedGuy|talk]]) 13:37, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
  
 
Is it low resolution, or small size of the figures, that this comic looks "retro" like the first few hundred, before Randall's art became really regular (perhaps he uses templates or programmatic drawing now?) [[User:Elizium23|Elizium23]] ([[User talk:Elizium23|talk]]) 23:06, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
 
Is it low resolution, or small size of the figures, that this comic looks "retro" like the first few hundred, before Randall's art became really regular (perhaps he uses templates or programmatic drawing now?) [[User:Elizium23|Elizium23]] ([[User talk:Elizium23|talk]]) 23:06, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:37, 6 May 2026


Was this late or was it just me?--OceanLord (talk) 20:08, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Somewhat late. Yes. But it's all good. 81.179.199.253 20:11, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
Publishing times are not very consistent. Mid-afternoon Eastern Time is not unusual. There have been quite a few times when it didn't arrive until late night, and occasionally even after midnight. Barmar (talk) 20:12, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
About a day late from usual. 47.248.235.170 20:20, 5 May 2026 (UTC)Pat
Oh right, I didn't even realize it's Tuesday afternoon. So yes, very late. Barmar (talk) 20:30, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
That's what I thought--OceanLord (talk) 20:41, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
And for more discussion (posted before this comic went live) see the bottom of yesterday's discussion. MAP (talk) 21:27, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
Interestingly, the xkcd archive page tooltip shows the publish date as "2026-05-04". hmmmm RDiMartino (talk) 00:46, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
Exactly, see archive and hold the curser over the comic. We usually use that day on this site. So should we use it and make a note that it was very late? If Randall does not aknowledge it being late what then? --Kynde (talk) 11:08, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
My (non-authoritative) opinion: It's just a (late, but not record-late) Monday comic, at least until we get some actual information that explains how it isn't.
If a clearly intended May The Fo(u)rth-type comic soon appears, with or without official comment, then it can be mentioned here and there that the other one exists, for the record. But until then it's... just a late-Monday one. The chatter here in the Talk section more than suffices, there's no real need for Trivia about this.
But that's just my thoughts. No more than a suggestion. 82.132.237.108 13:06, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

For those curious, an aircraft with one pair of wings is the aerodynamic equivalent of one pair of legs or wheels. It can work, but it requires careful considerations to keep it balanced. If a conventional aircraft loses its horizontal stabilizer, it will lose that balance and nose up or down uncontrollably. Aircraft that have no horizontal stabilizer usually use a method in which part of the main wing effectively functions in its place. RegularSizedGuy (talk) 21:01, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

I usually manage to use my legs without much careful consideration. 82.13.184.33 08:39, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
The consideration is mostly during the design phase, and even then, there were some serious compromises made that cause cumulative problems with the legs, pelvis, spine, and internal organs. RegularSizedGuy (talk) 13:37, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Is it low resolution, or small size of the figures, that this comic looks "retro" like the first few hundred, before Randall's art became really regular (perhaps he uses templates or programmatic drawing now?) Elizium23 (talk) 23:06, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Considering the timing, it is likely this was a backup comic that's been sitting around a while. Randall has said in the past that he keeps about a dozen comics in reserve just for that purpose.52.213.77.206 06:44, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
Aha, 1+1=2, that makes total sense. The joke itself is also notably timeless. Could be written many years ago easily. Shall we adjust the description to indicate that this is likely a backup comic? Hope everything is well at the Randall household! 178.119.6.18 10:15, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
Don't think it has a place in the explanation - it's nothing more than speculative. 82.13.184.33 10:37, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Sorry for the stupid question, but I don't know Darkstalkers outside of...those pix :-) Are the funny things on the heads of Lilith and Morrigan ailerons? 2A02:2455:1960:4000:95FB:B512:751B:45ED 08:30, 6 May 2026 (UTC)