Difference between revisions of "Talk:651: Bag Check"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "I am presuming beret guy has not been invented yet? ~~~~")
 
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
I am presuming beret guy has not been invented yet?
+
I am presuming beret guy has not been invented yet? [[User:Weatherlawyer| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer|talk]]) 05:08, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 +
:Beret first appeared in 167: Nihilism. This doesn't seem like his sort of thing anyway, since he could probably just drink out of the USB ports... -Pennpenn [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.162|108.162.250.162]] 06:42, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
  
[[User:Weatherlawyer| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer|talk]]) 05:08, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
+
I wonder if Randall got arrested for posting this comic and why it's still up. It sort of contains a guide to build a bomb, doesn't it? {{unsigned ip|162.158.90.163}}
 +
:Probably not. After all, just because people can easily learn how to pick a lock doesn't mean that people will go out and break into houses. [[User:SilverMagpie|SilverMagpie]] ([[User talk:SilverMagpie|talk]]) 05:29, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
Wait, if he proves the rules inconsistent, doesn't that mean that they can arrest him for anything via the principle of explosion? [[Special:Contributions/172.70.130.91|172.70.130.91]] 15:05, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 18:30, 5 November 2024

I am presuming beret guy has not been invented yet? I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait (talk) 05:08, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Beret first appeared in 167: Nihilism. This doesn't seem like his sort of thing anyway, since he could probably just drink out of the USB ports... -Pennpenn 108.162.250.162 06:42, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

I wonder if Randall got arrested for posting this comic and why it's still up. It sort of contains a guide to build a bomb, doesn't it? 162.158.90.163 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)

Probably not. After all, just because people can easily learn how to pick a lock doesn't mean that people will go out and break into houses. SilverMagpie (talk) 05:29, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Wait, if he proves the rules inconsistent, doesn't that mean that they can arrest him for anything via the principle of explosion? 172.70.130.91 15:05, 14 March 2022 (UTC)