Difference between revisions of "987: Potential"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
(I'm stumped)
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
This comic jokes about what a student could potentially create if they were working at their full potential. Instead of something like a better essay or a better {{w|science fair}} project, this student creates a 6-legged, car-destroying, helicopter-shooting monster robot.
 
This comic jokes about what a student could potentially create if they were working at their full potential. Instead of something like a better essay or a better {{w|science fair}} project, this student creates a 6-legged, car-destroying, helicopter-shooting monster robot.
 +
 +
The title text is a similar, more grounded scenario.
  
 
The moral of the comic is for students to not live up to their potential, because the havoc that results from doing so far outweighs the benefits of lethargy.
 
The moral of the comic is for students to not live up to their potential, because the havoc that results from doing so far outweighs the benefits of lethargy.

Revision as of 18:01, 3 May 2014

Potential
The bunch of disadvantaged kids I was tutoring became too good at writing, and their essays were forcing me to confront painful existential questions, so I started trying to turn them on to drugs and crime instead.
Title text: The bunch of disadvantaged kids I was tutoring became too good at writing, and their essays were forcing me to confront painful existential questions, so I started trying to turn them on to drugs and crime instead.

Explanation

Ambox notice.png This explanation may be incomplete or incorrect: Doesn't explain the title text
If you can address this issue, please edit the page! Thanks.

This comic jokes about what a student could potentially create if they were working at their full potential. Instead of something like a better essay or a better science fair project, this student creates a 6-legged, car-destroying, helicopter-shooting monster robot.

The title text is a similar, more grounded scenario.

The moral of the comic is for students to not live up to their potential, because the havoc that results from doing so far outweighs the benefits of lethargy.

Transcript

Narrator: When teachers complain, "You're not working at your full potential!"
[Explosion in background.]
Narrator: Don't take it too hard.
[Car casually spirals through the air while a crash is heard in the background.]
Narrator: They complain way more when you do.
[A mechanized, 6-tentacled robot rampages around, picking up cars and creating a small warzone before the student inside while the lamentations of people and the building of military forces are in the background.]
Throughout the third frame: AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
In the control center of the robot: Click, beep, whirr
Out-of-frame: It's headed this way!
Ponytail: Somebody stop him!


comment.png add a comment! ⋅ comment.png add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ Icons-mini-action refresh blue.gif refresh comments!

Discussion

They really do. Even if you end up becoming rich and famous, there's always that one guy who has to complain about you shafting them. Davidy²²[talk] 08:18, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Is there any chance this could be referring to the physics principle of Work? Z (talk) 23:54, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

I wish I could remember the quote from a teacher who supplied Gene Symmons with 50p to get a coffee after he bummed a coffee from a teacher. But I just forgot why. I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait (talk) 07:45, 22 January 2015 (UTC)