Difference between revisions of "Talk:explain xkcd"
(not sure) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Should we add a section on Jeff's absence or the lack of active admins? [[User:42.book.addict|<span style="font:11pt Cormorant Garamond"><span style="color:#5CA7CF">tor</span><span style="color:#F08DB0">i :3</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:42.book.addict|<span style="font:8pt Cormorant Garamond"><span style="color:#9E9E9E">talk </span><span style="color:#F08DB0">to </span><span style="color:#5CA7CF">me!</span>]]</span></sup> 18:30, 2 March 2026 (UTC) | Should we add a section on Jeff's absence or the lack of active admins? [[User:42.book.addict|<span style="font:11pt Cormorant Garamond"><span style="color:#5CA7CF">tor</span><span style="color:#F08DB0">i :3</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:42.book.addict|<span style="font:8pt Cormorant Garamond"><span style="color:#9E9E9E">talk </span><span style="color:#F08DB0">to </span><span style="color:#5CA7CF">me!</span>]]</span></sup> 18:30, 2 March 2026 (UTC) | ||
:I'm not sure. Those who simply read will have no use for it, and those who edit will learn it quite quickly. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|<span style="color:#023020">DollarStoreBa'al</span>]]<sup>[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|<span style="color:#09ff00">Converse</span>]]</sup> 18:49, 2 March 2026 (UTC) | :I'm not sure. Those who simply read will have no use for it, and those who edit will learn it quite quickly. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|<span style="color:#023020">DollarStoreBa'al</span>]]<sup>[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|<span style="color:#09ff00">Converse</span>]]</sup> 18:49, 2 March 2026 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::Though that ship has sailed (otherwise I really wouldn't say it just here), I'm not sure it's ''particularly'' useful to shout "Hey everyone! We don't have any Admins!". I mean, it's not that we ''don't'' have users with raised-level rights, so it's also a bit wrong, but I also consider it not exactly the most useful thing to declare. | ||
| + | ::Perhaps the time will come when it's important, but let's not hurry that time forward by putting such a detail prominently ont he Main page, FAQ or wherever you else you might think to mention it. (I'd even suggest that, but only ''if'' you both first declare your agreement, ''this conversation'' could be removed. It'll still exist in the page history, perhaps, but it'll need to be found by anyone who thinks that it's 'useful' information ahead of some disruption that they wish to cause... We'd probably undisrupt things easy enough, but no need to tempt the Fates so easily.) [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 20:15, 2 March 2026 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:15, 2 March 2026
Where is the current favicon of explain xkcd stored? β The π¦πΎπΏπ-π talk stalk 03:46, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
I am surprised that the discussion page isn't bigger. Beanie (talk) 10:01, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Is it okay if I upload the Explain xkcd logo to Wikipedia in order to create the wiki's Wikipedia page? --DollarStoreBa'alConverseMy life choices 18:00, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
Should we add a section on Jeff's absence or the lack of active admins? tori :3talk to me! 18:30, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
- I'm not sure. Those who simply read will have no use for it, and those who edit will learn it quite quickly. --DollarStoreBa'alConverse 18:49, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
- Though that ship has sailed (otherwise I really wouldn't say it just here), I'm not sure it's particularly useful to shout "Hey everyone! We don't have any Admins!". I mean, it's not that we don't have users with raised-level rights, so it's also a bit wrong, but I also consider it not exactly the most useful thing to declare.
- Perhaps the time will come when it's important, but let's not hurry that time forward by putting such a detail prominently ont he Main page, FAQ or wherever you else you might think to mention it. (I'd even suggest that, but only if you both first declare your agreement, this conversation could be removed. It'll still exist in the page history, perhaps, but it'll need to be found by anyone who thinks that it's 'useful' information ahead of some disruption that they wish to cause... We'd probably undisrupt things easy enough, but no need to tempt the Fates so easily.) 81.179.199.253 20:15, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
