Main Page
Welcome to the explain xkcd wiki!
We have an explanation for all 3299 xkcd comics, and only 54 (1.6%) are incomplete. Help us finish them!
Latest comic
| Trade |
 Title text: "You legs may have a comparative advantage at running, but we arms have a competitive advantage at swinging hammers, so unless you accept that we're the dominant limbs and stop hogging the oxygen, that running advantage won't be around for long." |
Explanation
This comic was published about a week after trade talks collapsed between the United States and Canada, leading to both levying heavy tariffs on each other.
Cueball's arms and legs are one part of a closed circulatory loop. The body sends oxygen-rich blood out around the limbs and receives oxygen-depleted blood in return. In isolation, that looks like a lopsided "deal." The body keeps sending high-value goods (O₂) and getting low-value goods (CO₂) back. But this is not a market failure; it's the entire point of having a circulatory system.
The joke maps onto a recurring argument in U.S. trade politics: that a bilateral trade deficit is inherently a loss. Donald Trump has made versions of this claim repeatedly. For instance, he tweeted in 2019 that the U.S. was "losing, for many years, 600 to 800 Billion Dollars a year on Trade," and more recently citing Canada's trade surplus with the U.S. as part of a $200 billion figure the U.S. was supposedly "losing" to its northern neighbor. Commentary at the time noted this framing treats the world as a zero-sum game where anything not made domestically counts as a loss.
Economists across the spectrum have pushed back on this accounting. Boston University economist Tarek Alexander Hassan wrote that a trade deficit "doesn't mean the US is losing money." It just means foreigners are sending more goods than they're receiving in return. Peterson Institute fellow Gary Hufbauer quipped that running a deficit with a country is "like saying that I lose $25,000 a year to Albertsons, where I do my shopping."
The "body sends oxygen, leg sends CO₂" setup is a fairly good stand-in for the standard rebuttal to deficit alarmism: a trade deficit is just the flip side of a capital account surplus. Commentators have pointed out that a country's trade deficit is largely the mirror image of foreigners wanting to hold its assets: you can't run an investment surplus and a trade surplus at the same time, which is why calling for both is incoherent. Economist Noah Smith has made a similar point about the misdiagnosis at the heart of deficit hawkery, framing the reflexive assumption that a negative trade-balance number means the country is "losing money" the same way a business loses money as the root confusion, when in fact, as with the circulatory system, one leg of the flow existing to balance the other is not evidence of exploitation.
The title text swaps in a second, more advanced trade-policy pun: "comparative advantage," Ricardo's classical argument that both parties gain from trade even if one party is better at everything because specializing in one's relatively-best activity still beats self-sufficiency, versus "competitive advantage," simply being better at a given task in absolute terms. The arm's threat that legs may be relatively better suited to running, but arms could physically overpower them by controlling the oxygen supply is a punchline version of an argument that has shown up almost verbatim in real trade-policy debates: that a country's specialization gains from comparative advantage are conditional on the dominant power's forbearance, and national-security or industrial-dominance concerns justify overriding them. Cueball ironically uses his other limbs (also a net consumer of oxygen, but supposedly justified by the fact that arms are good at "swinging hammers," and therefore considered somehow more valid recipients of oxygenated lifeblood) to threaten the legs (whose service to the body seem to be far less valued).
Peter Navarro, formerly Trump's senior trade advisor, has acknowledged the textbook logic that, under the Ricardian model, if two countries trade freely and fairly, each works to its comparative advantage and the collective pie gets bigger, while simultaneously arguing that the U.S. shouldn't accept the resulting trade pattern, framing reliance on other countries as a national-security threat that justifies tariffs regardless of the efficiency case. He has also cast global supply-chain dominance explicitly as a power struggle to be won rather than a specialization to be accepted, writing that a rival power's control over a resource is being used to "dominate global commerce and project state power," and describing the U.S. response in the same competitive terms the arm uses: building alternatives fast enough to "gain a competitive advantage." That's structurally the same move as the title text's arm: conceding the comparative-advantage math, then arguing the dominant party should use its leverage anyway before the other side's natural advantage sticks.
The comic 3073: Tariffs previously expressed very similar attitudes towards this same issue.
Transcript
- [Cueball is seen standing in profile, with one leg in the air bent at the knee. He is holding a hammer, pointed at his bent leg, in one hand.]
- Cueball: Listen up, leg.
- Cueball: I've been sending you rich, oxygenated blood for years, while you send me worthless used-up blood with no oxygen.
- Cueball: Time to teach you a lesson about not ripping me off!
- [Caption below the panel:]
- Tariffs
View comic discussionNew here?
You can read a brief introduction about this wiki at explain xkcd. Feel free to create an account and contribute to the wiki! We need explanations for xkcd comics, characters, What If? articles, and everything in between. If it is referenced in an xkcd comic, it should be here.
- If you're new to wiki editing, see the explain xkcd:Editor FAQ for a specific guidance to this wiki and the more general help on how to edit wiki pages. There's also a handy wikicode cheatsheet.
- Discussion about the wiki itself happens at the Community portal.
- You can browse the comics from the list of all comics or by navigating the category tree at Category:Comics.
- The incomplete explanations are listed here. Feel free to help out by expanding them!
Rules
Don't be a jerk!
There are a lot of comics that don't have set-in-stone explanations; feel free to put multiple interpretations in the wiki page for each comic.
If you want to talk about a specific comic, use its discussion page.
Please only submit material directly related to xkcd and, of course, only submit material that can legally be posted and freely edited. Off-topic or other inappropriate content is subject to removal or modification at admin discretion, and users who repeatedly post such content will be blocked.
If you need assistance from an admin, post a message to the Admin requests board.
