Difference between pages "1508: Operating Systems" and "1115: Sky"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
(Difference between pages)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Category:Comics featuring Elon Musk)
 
m (Explanation: clean up, typos fixed: For example → For example,)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{comic
 
{{comic
| number    = 1508
+
| number    = 1115
| date      = April 6, 2015
+
| date      = October 1, 2012
| title    = Operating Systems
+
| title    = Sky
| image    = operating systems.png
+
| image    = sky.png
| titletext = One of the survivors, poking around in the ruins with the point of a spear, uncovers a singed photo of Richard Stallman. They stare in silence. "This," one of them finally says, "This is a man who BELIEVED in something."
+
| titletext = I dropped a bird and I didn't hear it hit bottom.
 
}}
 
}}
  
 
==Explanation==
 
==Explanation==
In this comic, [[Randall]] gives an {{w|Gantt chart|overview}} of past, present and (speculatively) future of the {{w|operating system}}s running in his house at any given time. Notably, because Randall is fascinated by technology, he has had more than one OS running in his household since the mid '90's. The timeline tracks how Operating Systems have come and gone over the years, and the gradual shift from desktop Operating Systems to mobile can be observed. Beyond the present day, we see some of Randall's humorous predictions as to which technologies and companies will dominate the Operating System landscape in the future.
+
This comic is about the fact that much of the way we see the world is subjective. From space the directions up and down appear subjective, as gravity can not be strongly felt. Also since the {{w|vestibular}} system (the balance glands in the ear) does not strongly impact {{w|equilibrioception}} (the sense of balance) and the sense of balances is often based on vision, which uses subjective clues to determine what is the up and down, up and down can seem arbitrary at times. For example, people can convince them selves (accidentally or deliberately) that up is down and down is up or be confused about their orientation (dizzy). Forcing yourself to think in a different perspective changes a lot of things that are usually thought of as mundanities.
  
It may be that the OS that is closest to the time-line is also the one he mainly uses during these extended periods.
+
[[Beret Guy]] convinces himself that down is toward the sky. [[Megan]] witnesses and asks him why he is clinging to the ground. He responds that he is holding on to the ground so that he does not fall into the sky. Megan at first dismisses this but later looks up, gets scared and is found by [[Ponytail]], clinging to a mailbox afraid of falling up.
  
Previous and current systems:
+
The title text continues this idea, where  Megan "drops" a bird into the sky, and never hears it hit the "bottom". As birds can fly, and captured birds often fly away when released, its flight appeared to Megan as the bird falling upward. "didn't hear it hit bottom" would normally mean that, after you throw a rock into a pit, it takes too long to hit bottom, or the sound couldn't even make it to the thrower.
*{{w|MS-DOS}} (Microsoft Disk Operating System): The default, command-line-based OS on most IBM PC-compatible computers. Early versions of Windows operated as shells on top of MS-DOS rather than stand-alone OSes in their own right, which may explain part of the overlap in those two bars.
 
*Apple's {{w|Mac OS}} (Macintosh Operating System): The OS of Apple's Macintosh line of computers.  Randall's bar indicates that he stopped using Macs in 2001, after Mac OS had been superseded by the new and then-buggy {{w|Mac OS X}}.
 
*{{w|Linux}}: An open-source (typically free) Unix-like OS. Randall's bar indicates that he likely used it on one or two PCs starting from 1999 while still using Windows on other PCs, or perhaps was dual-booting one or more PCs with Windows, until abandoning Windows in 2007 to use Linux full-time. This timing coincides with the release of Microsoft's controversial {{w|Windows Vista}} and the advent of more user-friendly Linux distributions.
 
*{{w|OS X}} (Macintosh Operating System v10): The successor OS of Apple's Macintosh line of computers. Although it was sometimes marketed as merely the 10th version of the earlier Mac OS, it was largely a new product. The bar indicates Randall's renewed use of Macintosh computers in 2009 after the OS had matured and Macs had transitioned to Intel processors.
 
*{{w|Android_(operating_system)|Android}}: The upper layers of the OS running on Android phones and tablets, above the Linux {{w|Kernel_(operating_system)|kernel}}. Randall is indicating that he has at least one of these devices.
 
*Apple's {{w|iOS}}: The OS of {{w|iPhone}}, {{w|iPad}}, {{w|iPad mini}}, {{w|iPad Air}}, {{w|iPod Touch}} and {{w|Apple TV}}.  Randall is indicating that he also has at least one of these devices.
 
  
His predictions for the future include:
+
==Transcript==
*2018: That {{w|OS X}} and {{w|iOS}} will merge. There is frequent speculation on technology blogs as to whether or not this merging will come to pass in the future.  The two OSes have a common origin, share a lot of software, and are maintained by the same company that would benefit from the efficiency of maintaining a single unified OS. Opposing this is the fact that interaction patterns are very different between traditional computers and tablets/phones and a one-size-fits-both solution may not be feasible, and the fact that Apple spends some time in each of its recent keynotes mocking computers like the Microsoft Surface Pro which use both standard computer and touch control.
+
:[Megan approaches Beret Guy, who appears to be doing a handstand on the lawn.]
*2019: That an operating system designed with and for {{w|Javascript}} will become attractive, perhaps along the lines of [http://node-os.com/ NodeOS] and/or [http://github.com/runtimejs/runtime#readme Runtime.js].
+
:Megan: What are you doing?
*2022: That there'll be an OS based on the {{w|Tinder_(application)|Tinder}} dating app.
+
:Beret Guy: Clinging to the ceiling of a bottomless abyss.
*2024: That there'll be an OS from {{w|Nest Labs}}, presumably oriented towards home automation and the {{w|Internet of things}}.
 
*2029: That {{w|Elon Musk}} will come up with an operating system.
 
*2030: That {{w|Disk_operating_system|DOS}} would make a comeback, but only in an ironic fashion (maybe because there would be no more disks left for it to operate from).
 
*2034: That Randall will be deploying an [http://geneticliteracyproject.org/2014/07/genetically-engineered-red-blood-cells-could-be-drug-delivery-drones/ autonomous drug-delivery drone] in his body.
 
*2042: Human civilization comes to a fiery end, maybe due to some unholy combination of the above innovations. Another possible explanation is that human civilization will be wiped out by an artificial super-intelligence, superior to human intelligence, as Elon Musk, Ray Kurzweil, Bill Gates and many tech pundits foresee that 2045 will be the year to see such technology becoming real, and as Elon Musk, Bill Gates and many other tech pundits fear that it will be the extinction of all life on earth, as explained [http://waitbutwhy.com/2015/01/artificial-intelligence-revolution-2.html on this page].
 
*2059: At this time his operating system will be {{w|GNU}}/{{w|Hurd}}. This infamously and perennially late [http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/hurd.html GNU/Hurd] OS will finally make it in to Randall's home after human civilization has been wiped out. The joke is that GNU/Hurd began to be developed in 1990, and while it was expected to be released in a relatively short time, even now only unstable builds have been released. So Randall is saying that he will finally run it in his house a decade or two after the end of civilization. GNU/Hurd will presumably have an advantage as humanity rebuilds civilization due to the widespread availability of its code and development tools, and perhaps also because of Stallman's depth of belief, based on the title text. Alternatively, GNU/Hurd might be finished by the same force that finished humankind, for instance {{w|Skynet (Terminator)|Skynet}}, in case of {{w|Cybernetic revolt|AI Apocalypse}}. (Interestingly, although still far from completion, [http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/hurd/hurd.git/commit/?id=b8ffab7c38f3ede424b8a07553d6ee6b16abb85b a new version of GNU/Hurd] was released less than a week after this comic.)
 
 
 
The title text refers to {{w|Richard Stallman}}, the founder of the {{w|Free Software movement}} and the GNU and Hurd projects. A survivor of the fire that ended the human civilization has uncovered a slightly burned ({{w|Singe|singed}}) picture of him. Those gathered can see, either directly from the picture or because they already know of Stallman, that this was a man that really believed in something. In this case it was ''free software''. Inspired by his image, they rebuild their lost civilization and finish Hurd development.
 
 
 
Or maybe he means that a "herd" of {{w|Wildebeest|Gnus}} will be "running" in his living room, as wild animals reclaim the Earth after the end of human civilization.
 
 
 
GNU is a collection of free software utilities, particularly the system utilities used with the Linux Kernel to form the Linux operating system (often called GNU/Linux by those who wish to emphasize the contribution of the GNU project). Hurd is an operating system kernel designed as part of GNU project that could be used in place of the Linux kernel to produce a compete GNU operating system. Hurd has a microkernel architecture, which has many perceived advantages over Linux's monolithic kernel, and is thought by many to be technically superior, despite its low adoption rate compared to the Linux kernel.
 
  
Randall has made several comics about free software and also about Stallman. See this list of [[:Category:Comics featuring Richard Stallman|comics featuring Richard Stallman]]. Most of these are also about free software in some form.
+
:[Megan walks past him.]
 
+
:Megan: You are very odd.
==Transcript==
 
:[At the top of the panel:]
 
::'''Operating Systems'''
 
::running in my house
 
  
:[At the bottom there is time-line that runs from 1990 to 2066. It has small indicators for every year, larger for every 5 years and largest for every 10 years. Below the 10 year indicators are written the years. Also the year 2015 is marked:]
+
:[Megan towards a mailbox.]
:1990 2000 2010 Now 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
 
  
:[Bars above the time-line in four levels are labeled with operating system names, representing the time period for that OS. Below is a list of the bars on the time-line in order of first appearance (with approximate year ranges given). Also the level from 1-4 is indicated, with level 1 just above the time-line and level 4 the highest level above the line:]
+
:[As she passes the mailbox, she looks up.]
  
:[Level 1 from 1988 to 1998 (extends a little left past the beginning of the time-line but not off panel):]
+
:[This panel appears to be upside down. Megan is clinging to the mailbox, and Ponytail approaches her.]
::MS DOS
+
:Ponytail: What's wrong?
:[Level 2 from 1993 to 2007:]
+
:Megan: I looked down.
::Windows
 
:[Level 3 from 1994 to 2001:]
 
::Mac OS
 
:[Level 1 from 1999 to 2018:]
 
::Linux
 
:[Level 2 from 2009 to 2023. On the way the bar merges with iOS around 2019:]
 
::OS X
 
:[Level 3 from 2009 to 2016:]
 
::Android
 
:[Level 4 from 2013 to 2023. On the way to 2023 the bar moves down past Android to merge with OS X around 2019:]
 
::iOS
 
:[Level 1 from 2018 to 2028. The text is written in square brackets:]
 
::[Something].js
 
:[Level 3 from 2022 to 2029:]
 
::TinderOS
 
:[Level 2 from 2023 to 2032:]
 
::Nest
 
:[Level 1 from 2028 to 2041:]
 
::Elon Musk Project:
 
:[Level 3 from 2030 to 2036:]
 
::DOS, but ironically
 
:[Level 2 from 2034 to 2041:]
 
::Blood Drone
 
:[This is not a bar, but the text (in three lines) is in a, double bar-height (level 1-2), square bracket. The bracket extends from 2042 to 2051:]
 
::[Human civilization ends in fire]
 
:[Level 1 from 2059 going past the end of the panel past 2066:]
 
::GNU/Hurd
 
  
 +
==Trivia==
 +
*This comic's official transcript actually refers to [[Ponytail]] as Ponytail.
 
{{comic discussion}}
 
{{comic discussion}}
[[Category:Charts]]
+
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]
[[Category:Computers]]
+
[[Category:Comics featuring Ponytail]]
[[Category:Comics featuring Richard Stallman]]
+
[[Category:Comics featuring Beret Guy]]
[[Category:Comics featuring Elon Musk]]
 

Revision as of 16:05, 15 March 2016

Sky
I dropped a bird and I didn't hear it hit bottom.
Title text: I dropped a bird and I didn't hear it hit bottom.

Explanation

This comic is about the fact that much of the way we see the world is subjective. From space the directions up and down appear subjective, as gravity can not be strongly felt. Also since the vestibular system (the balance glands in the ear) does not strongly impact equilibrioception (the sense of balance) and the sense of balances is often based on vision, which uses subjective clues to determine what is the up and down, up and down can seem arbitrary at times. For example, people can convince them selves (accidentally or deliberately) that up is down and down is up or be confused about their orientation (dizzy). Forcing yourself to think in a different perspective changes a lot of things that are usually thought of as mundanities.

Beret Guy convinces himself that down is toward the sky. Megan witnesses and asks him why he is clinging to the ground. He responds that he is holding on to the ground so that he does not fall into the sky. Megan at first dismisses this but later looks up, gets scared and is found by Ponytail, clinging to a mailbox afraid of falling up.

The title text continues this idea, where Megan "drops" a bird into the sky, and never hears it hit the "bottom". As birds can fly, and captured birds often fly away when released, its flight appeared to Megan as the bird falling upward. "didn't hear it hit bottom" would normally mean that, after you throw a rock into a pit, it takes too long to hit bottom, or the sound couldn't even make it to the thrower.

Transcript

[Megan approaches Beret Guy, who appears to be doing a handstand on the lawn.]
Megan: What are you doing?
Beret Guy: Clinging to the ceiling of a bottomless abyss.
[Megan walks past him.]
Megan: You are very odd.
[Megan towards a mailbox.]
[As she passes the mailbox, she looks up.]
[This panel appears to be upside down. Megan is clinging to the mailbox, and Ponytail approaches her.]
Ponytail: What's wrong?
Megan: I looked down.

Trivia

  • This comic's official transcript actually refers to Ponytail as Ponytail.

comment.png  Add comment      new topic.png  Create topic (use sparingly)     refresh discuss.png  Refresh 

Discussion

As anyone who read Ender's Game know, "The enemy's gate is down". t must be noted that mentioned gate was in a zero-gravity environment so the usual definition of down being the direction gravitation is pulling us was not applicable. -- Hkmaly (talk) 08:09, 5 October 2012 (UTC) The enemy's gate is down. Also in Ender's Game, Ender makes reference to himself clinging to the earth just before he leaves it for the first time.

you could also now say that the movie made a small reference to that concept, though the middle half of the book was reduced to a 4 or 5 minute montage of battle scenes and Ender and his army being woken up a few times... sigh... how could I have expected it to be better :-( Brettpeirce (talk) 13:19, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Furthermore, the last panel might be a reference to Nietzsche's quote: "When you stare into the abyss, the abyss stares back at you".

Additionally, it might also allude to the law of gravity, as it operates in the realm of Cartoon physics. This interpretation would seem to match the 'perspective inversion' theme of the entire comic.123.237.156.4 08:14, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

I think the comment about a bottomless hole is misleading but I am not certain. the mass of the walls of the hole as well as surrounding matter would create a definite gravitational force, as would any gases or liquids that fill the hole. There would be a point (or possibly surface or line) depending on the composition and shape of whatever the bottomless hole is in as well as the contents and shape of the hole itself where the net gravitational force is zero, with all areas surrounding this point (surface or line) having gravitational forces pointing in the direction of the point/surface/line, unless the hole is in a body that extends in one direction off into infinity, in which case the mass of the entire system would be continually collapsing into a black hole as the mass of the body is infinite.

yuuuuup Brettpeirce (talk) 13:21, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

The comic also encapsulates a feeling about the sky. If you lie down in a flat area like the american southwest, all you can see is sky. All you can see is sky. All of the sudden, it feels like one little push could send you flying. You get the feeling that you are laying on a round, small surface, and are enveloped by a huge blue sky. In "Death comes for the Archbishop" There is a one line description of this feeling.

"The sky was as full of motion and change as the desert beneath it was monotonous and still, — and there was so much sky, more than at sea, more than anywhere else in the world. The plain was there, under one's feet, but what one saw when one looked about was that brilliant blue world of stinging air and moving cloud. Even the mountains were mere ant-hills under it. Elsewhere the sky is the roof of the world; but here the earth was the floor of the sky. The landscape one longed for when one was away, the thing all about one, the world one actually lived in, was the sky, the sky! --Death Comes to the Archbishop, Book VII, Ch. 4" [ http://www.en.wikibooks.org/wiki/American_Literature/20th_Century/Willa_Cather link title]

This comic seeks to describe that feeling of "The earth being the floor of the sky" --71.81.151.163 00:41, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Shouldn't his beret be shown on the ground? Xyz (talk) 19:34, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Staples. Squornshellous Beta (talk) 14:53, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
What Squornshellous Beta said. Brettpeirce (talk) 13:24, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Anyone else reminded of the Stone Tower Temple from Majora's Mask? 173.245.63.180 08:41, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Add this to the incomplete explanations list

There's no coverage on the title text. 173.245.54.90 02:52, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Done. --Dgbrt (talk) 19:42, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

I added an explanation on the title text. Anyone can feel free to correct it as they see fit. Codefreak5 (talk) 13:08, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Maybe it's a reference to Patema Inverted or Upside Down? 108.162.246.198 06:49, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

There may be another theme here, too: That a seemingly bizarre and unintuitive but irrefutable interpretation of reality may become the accepted interpretation, with implications that overturn our world view. We already saw this with General Relativity and the Grand Unified Theory. Maybe Beret Guy has hit on a Theory of Everything? 173.245.54.152 13:33, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

I think this is a simpler conception of the above theorist's. In cartoons, knowledge about gravity can be ignored until it's pointed out. We have endless scenes of the coyote chasing the road runner off a precipice, whereupon he sees the road runner's sign telling him to look down. He does this, and only then plummets to the ground. So Beret Guy "infects" Megan with his conception of "down," but it takes until she looks "down" to succumb to his interpretation of reality, causing her to cling to her mailbox for dear life. The final frame is from her perspective, though it doesn't affect Ponytail (yet!). Tquid (talk) 21:44, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

rewrite the explanation

there are plenty dictionary definitions and physics of the term "down" -- https://www.google.com/search?q=define+down&oq=define+down&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l5.1959j0j7&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=122&ie=UTF-8&qscrl=1 -- generally speaking "down" is in the direction you move from a higher point (of energy) to a lower point (of energy) -- so the explanation as it stand saying that "there is no set rule for what is down" is plainly wrong, and as the opening and defining argument of the explanation it warrant the entire explanation to be re-visited and re-written. Spongebog (talk) 17:40, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

If I could fall into the sky, do you think time would pass me by? ImVeryAngryItsNotButter (talk) 16:23, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

I kind of experience this too, but with tall buildings that have only one floor... Basically halls. Looking upwards in there can get me dizzy and give me fear of height. I feel like I might fall down there. The hall has to be well lighted and without a lot of things standing on the floor though, that ruins it. Sinni800 (talk) 00:04, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
      comment.png  Add comment