Difference between revisions of "3188: Anyone Else Here"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created by theusafBOT: 3188)
 
(Unsure about the claim that these comments wouldn’t interfere with the timeline)
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
==Explanation==
 
==Explanation==
{{incomplete|This page was created recently. Don't remove this notice too soon.}}
+
{{incomplete|This page was created by a youTuber without internet Don't remove this notice too soon.}}
 +
This comic makes fun of a common method that YouTube commenters use to farm likes and replies by saying "Who is watching in [year]?" The comment is considered something of a meme within YouTube, and besides that is intended as a compliment implying the video is "timeless" or otherwise a happy memory worth revisiting. These comments often are phrased similarly to the comments in the comic.
 +
 
 +
The comic, however, presents them instead as time travelers who are lost, and their preferred method of communicating with other time travelers is posting YouTube comments about watching a specific video in a specific year. This may be a somewhat ingenious way of staying incognito while still being able to relay messages, as many people don't read the comments,{{cn}} and of those who do, the actual comment itself is somewhat innocuous and easily overlooked, so it would cause little-to-no disruption in the timeline{{cn}}.
  
 
==Transcript==
 
==Transcript==
 
{{incomplete transcript|Don't remove this notice too soon.}}
 
{{incomplete transcript|Don't remove this notice too soon.}}
 +
 +
:[The bottom of a YouTube video is shown, with the play and volume icons visible.]
 +
:[There are two lines of illegible text below the videos.]
 +
:564 Comments
 +
:[To the right of "564 Comments" are three parallel lines of different lengths representing YouTube's "sort by" function. A long horizontal line is below.]
 +
:[Three YouTube comments are shown. Each one has an avatar to the left, an @ sign before an illegible name, with smaller illegible text next to it. Below each comment are the YouTube thumbs-up icon, illegible text, the YouTube thumbs-down icon, and more illegible text.]
 +
:[Avatar: A Cueball-like person seen from the chest up, but with a wider torso than usual.] Who else is here in 2023?
 +
:[Avatar: A double chevron pointing to the upper left.] Is anyone else watching this in 2017?
 +
:[Avatar: A Megan-like person standing.] Anyone else here in 2025??
 +
 +
:[Text below the panel:]
 +
:For some reason, confused time travelers always try to find each other using YouTube comments.
  
 
{{comic discussion}}<noinclude>
 
{{comic discussion}}<noinclude>
 +
[[Category:YouTube]]
 +
[[Category:Time travel]]
 +
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]
 +
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]

Latest revision as of 12:39, 1 January 2026

Anyone Else Here
Anyone else watching this Youtube video in 1954? If so, my last trip definitely messed with the timeline.
Title text: Anyone else watching this Youtube video in 1954? If so, my last trip definitely messed with the timeline.

Explanation[edit]

Ambox warning blue construction.svg This is one of 62 incomplete explanations:
This page was created by a youTuber without internet Don't remove this notice too soon. If you can fix this issue, edit the page!

This comic makes fun of a common method that YouTube commenters use to farm likes and replies by saying "Who is watching in [year]?" The comment is considered something of a meme within YouTube, and besides that is intended as a compliment implying the video is "timeless" or otherwise a happy memory worth revisiting. These comments often are phrased similarly to the comments in the comic.

The comic, however, presents them instead as time travelers who are lost, and their preferred method of communicating with other time travelers is posting YouTube comments about watching a specific video in a specific year. This may be a somewhat ingenious way of staying incognito while still being able to relay messages, as many people don't read the comments,[citation needed] and of those who do, the actual comment itself is somewhat innocuous and easily overlooked, so it would cause little-to-no disruption in the timeline[citation needed].

Transcript[edit]

Ambox warning green construction.svg This is one of 34 incomplete transcripts:
Don't remove this notice too soon. If you can fix this issue, edit the page!
[The bottom of a YouTube video is shown, with the play and volume icons visible.]
[There are two lines of illegible text below the videos.]
564 Comments
[To the right of "564 Comments" are three parallel lines of different lengths representing YouTube's "sort by" function. A long horizontal line is below.]
[Three YouTube comments are shown. Each one has an avatar to the left, an @ sign before an illegible name, with smaller illegible text next to it. Below each comment are the YouTube thumbs-up icon, illegible text, the YouTube thumbs-down icon, and more illegible text.]
[Avatar: A Cueball-like person seen from the chest up, but with a wider torso than usual.] Who else is here in 2023?
[Avatar: A double chevron pointing to the upper left.] Is anyone else watching this in 2017?
[Avatar: A Megan-like person standing.] Anyone else here in 2025??
[Text below the panel:]
For some reason, confused time travelers always try to find each other using YouTube comments.

comment.png  Add comment      new topic.png  Create topic (use sparingly)     refresh discuss.png  Refresh 

Discussion

Anyone here in 2050? King Pando (talk) 22:20, 31 December 2050 (UTC)
oh that's what that type of comment's about Treeplate (talk)

Anybody reading this in 2525? Is man still alive? Did woman survive?Lordpishky (talk) 22:28, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Did they fall in love? --Aaron of Mpls (talk) 22:46, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
What did they find?Lordpishky (talk) 02:03, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Any read this 1000000 BC? Do Kroog make fire? --User 8496351 (talk) 22:46, 31 December 1000001 BC (UTC)

I'm here from exactly two years in your future. Well, perhaps not your future because... ah... best not say, just in case. 92.23.2.208 12:39, 1 January 2028 (UTC)

Why does the end of the explanation appear to have been written by AI? Am I going crazy or does that look like how ChatGPT would describe xkcd? CreatorOfWorlds (talk) 22:52, 31 December 2025 (UTC)


"Anyone else here?" vs. "Anyone else now?". It's always fun overanalyzing why *this* point in space-time is a here or now, while *that* point in space-time is a there or then. 84.233.216.138 00:31, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

I’m surprised there’s no “Anyone here in 2026?” yet 50.239.67.6 05:58, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

I've travelled [1] all the way from the year 2025 to say: happy new year! 185.36.194.156 02:31, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Anybody else get a wave of Déjà vu from this? 134.231.105.61 05:36, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

I think the explanation discounting it as a "trick" is disingenuous. It would be like calling a forum user creating a new topic "engagement farming". 64.114.211.52 06:41, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
      comment.png  Add comment