explain xkcd:Sandbox

Welcome to the explain xkcd wiki!
We have an explanation for all 3190 xkcd comics, and only 57 (2%) are incomplete. Help us finish them!

Latest comic

Go to this comic explanation

Telescope Types

|< < Prev #3182 (December 17, 2025)

Title text: I'm trying to buy a gravitational lens for my camera, but I can't tell if the manufacturers are listing comoving focal length or proper focal length.

|< < Prev Random Explanation

Explanation

This is incomplete: This page was created recently ACCORDING TO A TELESCOPE POINTING BACK IN TIME. Don't remove this notice too soon. If you can fix this issue, edit the page!

This comic shows diagrams of a number of different types of telescope, some real and others made up by Randall. It includes both refracting and reflecting designs; see 1791: Telescopes: Refractor vs Reflector for the important (according to Randall) differences between them.

Type	Real?	Refractor/Reflector	Description
Prime Focus	Yes	Reflector	A telescope design where the observer/receiver is situated at the focal point of a single mirror. Rare in optics, but a common design in radio telescopes.
Herschelian	Yes	Reflector	A telescope design much akin to Prime Focus but with the mirror tilted so that the observer does not block incoming light. Named after astronomer William Herschel.
Newtonian	Yes	Reflector	Newtonian telescopes employ a second, flat mirror along with the primary parabolic mirror.
Galilean	Yes	Refractor	What might usually come to mind when picturing a telescope. A long tube that uses lenses rather than mirrors (making it a refracting telescope) to magnify images.
Keplerian	Yes	Refractor	An improvement on Galilean telescopes, using a convex lens rather than a concave one at the eyepiece (as shown in the diagram). It does however invert images.
Gregorian	Yes	Reflector	Uses two concave mirrors, the secondary being placed beyond the primary's focal point. The image is reflected back through a hole in the primary mirror. Unique among reflectors in that the image is not inverted.
Cassegrain	Yes	Reflector	Similar to prime focus, but uses a secondary mirror to reflect light through a hole in the primary mirror to the observer (situated at the rear)
Cardboard tube	Yes, but not as a telescope	Neither	Looking through a tube helps you focus by removing distractions, but doesn't magnify the object being viewed.
Kaleido	Yes, but not as a telescope	Reflector?	A kaleidoscope isn't really a telescope, because the non-viewing end is closed. You view many reflections of tiny objects at the end, rather than remote objects. The mirrors are also usually flat, so there's no magnification.
Liquid Mirror	Yes	Reflector	A telescope with the same design as Prime Focus, using a rotating pool of reflective liquid (most commonly mercury) as a mirror. The diagram adds a straw so that someone can drink the liquid. This would likely not end well for the drinker.
Narcissian	Yes, but not as a telescope	Reflector	This is like a prime focus telescope, but the focus is outside the end of the telescope where the viewer is located. So they can only see themselves, greatly magnified. This is inspired by the myth of Narcissus, who fell in love with his reflection in a pool of water. House of mirrors might feature such a "telescope", because it is basically a concave mirror, which would be a typical attraction at a funfair.
Gravitational	Yes	Refractor	These can't be constructed on Earth[citation needed], they're formed naturally by large stars (particularly black holes) and galaxies. There are proposals to launch missions to the very far reaches of the Solar System to "construct" a Solar gravitational lens telescope, but the masses and distances involved are not compatible with consumer camera hardware. In the title text, Randall makes a pun on whether the listed focal length of a gravitational lens is measured in the comoving or proper reference frame, i.e. whether the expansion of the universe (between the place and time of the lens's creation or construction and Randall's decision to purchase) has been factored out or not. At the cosmological scales between stars and galaxies, where gravitational lensing is most relevant, this is a useful distinction to make, but stars are not for sale (by any legitimate commercial entity) and so nobody would be advertising any focal length in either reference frame for any purchaser.
Geological	No	Reflector	This 'telescope' employs a single mirror to show the observer the 2003 movie "The Core". As a telescope it would not be useful, not least because it cannot be pointed at anything in the sky.

Transcript

This is one of 30 incomplete transcripts: Don't remove this notice too soon. If you can fix this issue, edit the page!

  Add comment        Create topic (use sparingly)       Refresh 

Discussion

Make changes, try things out, or just have fun with the wiki here! Just leave everything above the line alone, please.

---

This is a test. PoolloverNathan^{[stalk the blue seas]} 20:48, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

This is not. —While False (museum | talk | contributions | logs | rights | printable version | page information | what links there | related changes | Google search | current time: 05:26) 18:38, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

A foreign student asked me to help fight against his math teacher. That was unusual. He was in that class for just a couple of weeks. The teacher's phone number was sent to me. The student asked me to spam-call the teacher. 172.71.155.55 22:58, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

here i'm just messing around in html, ignore this

^furhhfghure _{guyrburgryhuyvfr} "rvhru"

interesting way of writing quotations xd

hmmm this one of putting "<p>" in a line break will come in handy for when i want it to start at the same place than the first line

Please beware that <p> on mediawiki also disables automatic paragraph breaks, so you need a closing </p> or you'll break automatic paragraph formatting for the rest of the page. Zmatt (talk) 22:06, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

edit: da hek did that "</div>" come from An user who has no account yet (talk) 14:14, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

hi uh its hard to get here. is this a reference to undocumented feature??? hmm... this is interesting.
108.162.241.216 02:05, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

	Soup

yum yum [citation needed]

Hiuiedeixgeyceiyedhcdiedcve {{trout}}

This is the leaderboard:

Last 7 days (Top 50)

Rank Score Pages Changes Username 1 264 262 263 管委会篝火无法解放军“赐额“你去呢管理哦法？ 2 22 18 22 TheusafBOT 3 15 4 33 Firestar233 4 13 6 20 BunsenH 5 13 6 20 Barry Margolin 6 11 7 12 DollarStoreBa'al 7 11 8 11 R128 8 11 4 17 Kynde 9 11 8 10 Headphones the stickman 10 9 9 9 Lp0 on fire 11 6 3 6 DKMell 12 6 3 6 Trimutius 13 5 1 6 Lordpishky 14 5 3 4 Potatocakethrow 15 5 5 5 FaviFake 16 5 5 5 1234231587678 17 5 2 4 David Garfield 18 4 2 3 Sturmovik 19 4 4 4 Victoria 20 4 2 3 CheshireCat 21 4 1 3 Jeff 22 3 3 3 Steve Spivey 23 3 3 3 ExplainEuge.ca 24 3 1 2 boB 25 3 1 2 Ianrbibtitlht 26 3 1 2 Magtei 27 3 1 2 Kevin Stern 28 3 1 2 627235 29 3 1 2 Paul Nickerson 30 3 1 2 Elektrizikekswerk 31 3 3 3 August Fuller 32 2 2 2 Bobthegoat123 33 2 2 2 Mathmaster 34 2 2 2 KelOfTheStars! 35 2 2 2 NotBob 36 2 2 2 NotaBene 37 1 1 1 Orion205 38 1 1 1 Jim 39 1 1 1 Kirinhatchi 40 1 1 1 Daniel G. Axtell 41 1 1 1 Tigerpile 42 1 1 1 Heleatunda 43 1 1 1 Vicente Garza Reyna 44 1 1 1 Caber 45 1 1 1 Joel Croteau 46 1 1 1 Nachtvogel 47 1 1 1 Tibbs 48 1 1 1 KarMann 49 1 1 1 Brett Thwaites 50 1 1 1 Zabadoh

<a href=" [AT THE JULY 28TH MEETING][tab] "Cancel the meeting! Our cover is blown.">
        Add comment

Is this out of date? .

New here?

Last 7 days (Top 10)

Rank Score Pages Changes Username 1 264 262 263 管委会篝火无法解放军“赐额“你去呢管理哦法？ 2 22 18 22 TheusafBOT 3 15 4 33 Firestar233 4 13 6 20 BunsenH 5 13 6 20 Barry Margolin 6 11 7 12 DollarStoreBa'al 7 11 8 11 R128 8 11 4 17 Kynde 9 11 8 10 Headphones the stickman 10 9 9 9 Lp0 on fire

Lots of people contribute to make this wiki a success. Many of the recent contributors, listed above, have just joined. You can do it too! Create your account here.

You can read a brief introduction about this wiki at explain xkcd. Feel free to sign up for an account and contribute to the wiki! We need explanations for comics, characters, themes and everything in between. If it is referenced in an xkcd web comic, it should be here.

• If you're new to wiki editing, see the explain xkcd:Editor FAQ for a specific guidance to this Wiki and the more general help on how to edit wiki pages. There's also a handy wikicode cheatsheet.

• Discussion about the wiki itself happens at the Community portal.

• You can browse the comics from List of all comics or by navigating the category tree at Category:Comics.

• There are incomplete explanations listed here. Feel free to help out by expanding them!

Rules

Don't be a jerk!

There are a lot of comics that don't have set-in-stone explanations; feel free to put multiple interpretations in the wiki page for each comic.

If you want to talk about a specific comic, use its discussion page.

Please only submit material directly related to (and helping everyone better understand) xkcd... and of course only submit material that can legally be posted (and freely edited). Off-topic or other inappropriate content is subject to removal or modification at admin discretion, and users who repeatedly post such content will be blocked.

If you need assistance from an admin, post a message to the Admin requests board.