Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Welcome to the explain xkcd sandbox!
We have an explanation for all 3190 xkcd comics,
and only 57
(2%) are incomplete. Help us finish them!
(Not the) latest comic
Go to this comic explanation
| Telescope Types |
|
Title text: I'm trying to buy a gravitational lens for my camera, but I can't tell if the manufacturers are listing comoving focal length or proper focal length. |
|
|
Explanation
|
This is incomplete:
This page was created recently ACCORDING TO A TELESCOPE POINTING BACK IN TIME. Don't remove this notice too soon. If you can fix this issue, edit the page!
|
This comic shows diagrams of a number of different types of telescope, some real and others made up by Randall. It includes both refracting and reflecting designs; see 1791: Telescopes: Refractor vs Reflector for the important (according to Randall) differences between them.
| Type |
Real? |
Refractor/Reflector |
Description
|
| Prime Focus |
Yes |
Reflector |
A telescope design where the observer/receiver is situated at the focal point of a single mirror. Rare in optics, but a common design in radio telescopes.
|
| Herschelian |
Yes |
Reflector |
A telescope design much akin to Prime Focus but with the mirror tilted so that the observer does not block incoming light. Named after astronomer William Herschel.
|
| Newtonian |
Yes |
Reflector |
Newtonian telescopes employ a second, flat mirror along with the primary parabolic mirror.
|
| Galilean |
Yes |
Refractor |
What might usually come to mind when picturing a telescope. A long tube that uses lenses rather than mirrors (making it a refracting telescope) to magnify images.
|
| Keplerian |
Yes |
Refractor |
An improvement on Galilean telescopes, using a convex lens rather than a concave one at the eyepiece (as shown in the diagram). It does however invert images.
|
| Gregorian |
Yes |
Reflector |
Uses two concave mirrors, the secondary being placed beyond the primary's focal point. The image is reflected back through a hole in the primary mirror. Unique among reflectors in that the image is not inverted.
|
| Cassegrain |
Yes |
Reflector |
Similar to prime focus, but uses a secondary mirror to reflect light through a hole in the primary mirror to the observer (situated at the rear)
|
| Cardboard tube |
Yes, but not as a (functional) telescope |
Neither |
Children may sometimes use tubes, particularly the cardboard middles from paper rolls, as a play 'telescope'. Looking through a tube can give an illusion of magnification by removing distractions and focusing your attention on the object in view, but it doesn't actually magnify the object being viewed. It will still cause a minor optical effect due to diffraction on the edges of the tube.
|
| Kaleido |
Yes, but not as a telescope |
Reflector |
A kaleidoscope is similar in form to the stereotypical 'ship's telescope', being a tubular object that you look in to one end of. However, it isn't really a telescope, because you can't use it to magnify arbitrary objects of interest. The non-viewing end is closed, and you view patterns created by many fragmented reflections of tiny objects contained at the end, rather than remote objects. The mirrors are also usually flat, so there's no magnification.
|
| Liquid Mirror |
Yes |
Reflector |
A telescope with the same design as Prime Focus, using a rotating pool of reflective liquid (most commonly mercury) as a mirror. The diagram adds a straw so that someone can drink the liquid. This would not improve telescope performance or end well for the drinker.
|
| Narcissian |
Yes, but not as a telescope |
Reflector |
This is like a prime focus telescope, but the focus is outside the end of the telescope where the viewer is located, so they can only see themselves, magnified by the concave mirror. This is inspired by the myth of Narcissus, who fell in love with his reflection in a pool of water. A house of mirrors (a typical attraction at a funfair) might feature such a 'telescope', because it is basically a concave mirror.
|
| Gravitational |
Yes |
Refractor |
Using the gravitational effect of very large objects on the light passing around them to gain a magnified (if distorted) view of objects beyond them. These are formed naturally by large stars (particularly black holes) and galaxies, which can't be constructed on Earth[citation needed]. There are proposals to launch missions to the very far reaches of the Solar System to "construct" a Solar gravitational lens telescope, but the masses and distances involved are not compatible with consumer camera hardware. In the title text, Randall makes a pun on whether the listed focal length of a gravitational lens is measured in the comoving or proper reference frame — that is, whether the expansion of the universe (between the place and time of the lens's creation or construction and Randall's decision to purchase) has been factored out or not. At the cosmological scales between stars and galaxies, where gravitational lensing is most relevant, this is a useful distinction to make, but stars are not for sale (by any legitimate commercial entity) and so nobody would be advertising any focal length in either reference frame for any purchaser.
|
| Geological |
No |
Reflector |
This 'telescope' employs a single mirror to show the observer the 2003 movie The Core, which was universally derided by science-minded people. As a telescope it would not be useful, not least because it cannot be pointed at an arbitrary object. Its relevance to real geology is also dubious.
|
Transcript
Add comment 
Create topic (use sparingly) 
Refresh Discussion
Make changes, try things out, or just have fun with the wiki here! Just leave everything above the line alone, please.
This is a test. PoolloverNathan[stalk the blue seas] 20:48, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- This is not. —While False (museum | talk | contributions | logs | rights | printable version | page information | what links there | related changes | Google search | current time: 16:18) 18:38, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- A foreign student asked me to help fight against his math teacher. That was unusual. He was in that class for just a couple of weeks. The teacher's phone number was sent to me. The student asked me to spam-call the teacher. 172.71.155.55 22:58, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
here i'm just messing around in html, ignore this
furhhfghure guyrburgryhuyvfr "rvhru"
interesting way of writing quotations xd
- hmmm this one of putting "<p>" in a line break will come in handy for when i want it to start at the same place than the first line
- Please beware that <p> on mediawiki also disables automatic paragraph breaks, so you need a closing </p> or you'll break automatic paragraph formatting for the rest of the page. Zmatt (talk) 22:06, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
edit: da hek did that "</div>" come from An user who has no account yet (talk) 14:14, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
hi uh its hard to get here.
is this a reference to undocumented feature??? hmm... this is interesting.
108.162.241.216 02:05, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
yum yum [citation needed]
Hiuiedeixgeyceiyedhcdiedcve
{{trout}}
This is the leaderboard:
<a href=" [AT THE JULY 28TH MEETING][tab] "Cancel the meeting! Our cover is blown.">
Add comment
New to the explain xkcd sandbox?
Lots of people contribute to make this wiki a success. Many of the recent contributors, listed above, have
just joined. You can do it too! Create your account
here.
You can read a brief introduction about this wiki at explain xkcd. Feel free to sign up for an account and contribute to the wiki! We need explanations for comics, characters, themes and everything in between. If it is referenced in an xkcd web comic, it should be here.
- There are incomplete explanations listed here. Feel free to help out by expanding them!
Trivia
If you need assistance from an admin, post a message to the Admin requests board.
Add comment Create topic (use sparingly) Refresh Discussion
Make changes, try things out, or just have fun with the wiki here! Just leave everything above the line alone, please.
This is a test. PoolloverNathan[stalk the blue seas] 20:48, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- This is not. —While False (museum | talk | contributions | logs | rights | printable version | page information | what links there | related changes | Google search | current time: 16:18) 18:38, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- A foreign student asked me to help fight against his math teacher. That was unusual. He was in that class for just a couple of weeks. The teacher's phone number was sent to me. The student asked me to spam-call the teacher. 172.71.155.55 22:58, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
here i'm just messing around in html, ignore this
furhhfghure guyrburgryhuyvfr "rvhru"
interesting way of writing quotations xd
- hmmm this one of putting "<p>" in a line break will come in handy for when i want it to start at the same place than the first line
- Please beware that <p> on mediawiki also disables automatic paragraph breaks, so you need a closing </p> or you'll break automatic paragraph formatting for the rest of the page. Zmatt (talk) 22:06, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
edit: da hek did that "</div>" come from An user who has no account yet (talk) 14:14, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
hi uh its hard to get here.
is this a reference to undocumented feature??? hmm... this is interesting.
108.162.241.216 02:05, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
|
Soup
|
yum yum [citation needed]
Hiuiedeixgeyceiyedhcdiedcve
{{trout}}
This is the leaderboard:
<a href=" [AT THE JULY 28TH MEETING][tab] "Cancel the meeting! Our cover is blown.">
Add comment
