3205: Carbon Dating

Carbon Dating

|< < Prev #3205 (February 9, 2026)

Title text: This dating is corroborated by the presence of stone tools at the site, rather than earlier and less effective helium ones.

|< < Prev Random Explanation

Explanation

This is one of 62 incomplete explanations: This page was created recently by a WOODEN PICKAXE. Don't remove this notice too soon. If you can fix this issue, edit the page!

Carbon dating is a method for determining the age of an object containing organic material by using the properties of radiocarbon, a radioactive isotope of carbon. This method is commonly used by archaeologists and is invaluable in terms of predicting the time a piece of organic matter (such as a fossil) came from. It uses the fact that carbon consumed by living organisms contains a fixed ratio of the carbon isotopes C12, C13, and C14. Since C14 is radioactive, it decays over time. By measuring how much C14 is left in the leftover of an organism, archaeologists can determine how long ago the organism consumed carbon and thus how long ago it lived.

Here, however, Ponytail, in the role of a cosmologist, takes a rather different perspective on using carbon for dating. She is interested only in the mere presence of carbon, which tells her that the skeleton being studied was formed after the first carbon in the universe was created in the first round of stars fusing elements, 13.6 billion years ago. This is not useful information for judging artifacts originating on Earth, which is itself less than 5 billion years old, since it would apply to all of them.

The title text looks like the kind of statement that would provide corroborative dating evidence for an archaeological site. The type and composition of tools can help to place a site, relative to others, on a developmental timeline. Here, however, they claim that the presence of stone tools dates the site as later than a non-existent age of helium tools. Tools made out of stone, usually dating from the Stone Age, are often solid and durable, making them great choices for heavy duty tasks, and well-preserved in the archaeological record. Helium, however is a gas and is difficult to shape into a solid mass^{[citation needed]}. It would also be near impossible to identify such tools. Helium was produced in great quantities after the Big Bang, accounting for about ~25% of the elements produced by the early universe, so would have been available before stone was, but there were no people around at the time to fashion tools from it.

Transcript

This is one of 43 incomplete transcripts: Don't remove this notice too soon. If you can fix this issue, edit the page!

[Ponytail, standing, is pointing at a blackboard containing a drawing of a skull and some bones/bone fragments, as well as a graph and some lines of text. She is speaking to Cueball and Megan, who are standing beside her.]

Ponytail: The high carbon content of the skeleton indicates that the individual lived less than 13.6 billion years ago, after the first round of stellar nucleosynthesis.

[Caption below the panel:]

Cosmologist carbon dating

  Add comment        Create topic (use sparingly)       Refresh 

Discussion

F10st p0st! 185.36.194.156 04:45, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

First explanation! Hopefully it's fine... (also, nice TCMP reference.)--Utdtutyabthsc (talk) 06:00, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Oh, was that a deliberate reference? Why isn't it spelled the same way? What does "F10st" even mean? Elizium23 (talk) 06:58, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Semi-deliberate, but more spirit of the law than letter of the law since early internet trolling is (was?) a common theme here anyways lol; the 0 was a typo 185.36.194.156 10:04, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

It is though getting a little tiresome and repeatable that someone has begun writing first post on all talk pages... Please stop it ;-) --Kynde (talk) 13:19, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
        Add comment