We still have 16 explanations we need to complete. All incomplete explanations are here.
Help us finish the index of What if? articles! We need to clean up & add the new YouTube videos!
Difference between revisions of "Talk:2464: Muller's Ratchet"
(Created by dgbrtBOT) |
|||
(14 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--> | <!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--> | ||
+ | |||
+ | I do this frequently: Seeking out the best quality of two media I've seen put together, in an effort to improve the quality of the resultant combined media. | ||
+ | |||
+ | I had no idea, all this time I'd been creating recombinant PNG. | ||
+ | [[User:ProphetZarquon|ProphetZarquon]] ([[User talk:ProphetZarquon|talk]]) 20:58, 17 May 2021 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | This is the first time I've encountered recombination, but I've seen the many versions of images scattered across the internet for sure --[[User:Char Latte49|Wielder of the Staple Gun]] ([[User talk:Char Latte49|talk]]) 21:33, 17 May 2021 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | On a number of occasions I've had to edit images given to me to submit to a resource. The original photographer ''insists'' on having a 'burnt-on' timestamp directly on the image (he's always done that, and won't accept metadata does the job); meanwhile, the resource's policies are heavily against such 'decoration' and moderators often reject such. When I can't easily clone a 'coverage' area from within the same image - and feather its edges to blend in - I sometimes find another original (but slightly different viewpoint) submitted image that has a sufficiently unsullied 'patch' to let it pass muster. That's a slightly meta-example, I suppose. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.161|141.101.99.161]] 23:17, 17 May 2021 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Sexual reproduction pictures on teh Interwebz mkay, but I lament a certain underrepresentation of amoeba pr0n. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.105.134|141.101.105.134]] 08:33, 18 May 2021 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | im guessing this time traveller ^^ just came back from 2008. dont go to 2020. ever. just dont. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.79.59|162.158.79.59]] 14:36, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Bumpf | ||
+ | |||
+ | That's a squirrel?? Look at its tail - squirrels have thick fluffy tails, not that skinny one. And if it is a squirrel, it's by far the largest I've ever seen - unless Hairbun and Cueball are children. I was 100% certain when I saw it that it was a cat. --mezimm [[Special:Contributions/172.69.42.124|172.69.42.124]] 14:53, 18 May 2021 (UTC) | ||
+ | :: And we do know how Randall draws squirrels: [[1503]], [[1578]], [[776]], and [[1156]] all contain examples. I vote that this be changed. --mezimm [[Special:Contributions/172.69.42.21|172.69.42.21]] 14:58, 18 May 2021 (UTC) | ||
+ | :: I'm not sure that's a cat, the muzzle looks wrong to me. Some other feline, maybe. A 4-legged furry mammal with a tail, almost definitely. Could we ask Randall for clarification? [[Special:Contributions/172.69.22.132|172.69.22.132]] 19:45, 18 May 2021 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::Looks like a rat to me. Maybe a possum or something? It has a pointed muzzle. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.75.160|162.158.75.160]] 20:56, 18 May 2021 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::Definitely an opossum or other such larger marsupial. Its muzzle is too pointed to be a cat. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.75.144|162.158.75.144]] 02:08, 20 May 2021 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::::It looks like a large city rat to me-have you seen the proportions those rodents can get to?!?https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/giant-rat-found-in-london-gas-engineer-finds-rodent-bigger-than-a-small-child-a6925591.html [[User:42.book.addict|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict|talk]]) 21:02, 2 February 2024 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::: It looks like a squirrel to me; I was shocked to see it being described as a cat. It doesn't have pointed ears! The tail is also in a classic squirrel position, and while it's admittedly thin for a squirrel, that may be a stylistic choice - it's still three times the thickness of the humans' arms. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.33.196|162.158.33.196]] 15:27, 22 July 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 15:27, 22 July 2024
I do this frequently: Seeking out the best quality of two media I've seen put together, in an effort to improve the quality of the resultant combined media.
I had no idea, all this time I'd been creating recombinant PNG. ProphetZarquon (talk) 20:58, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
This is the first time I've encountered recombination, but I've seen the many versions of images scattered across the internet for sure --Wielder of the Staple Gun (talk) 21:33, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
On a number of occasions I've had to edit images given to me to submit to a resource. The original photographer insists on having a 'burnt-on' timestamp directly on the image (he's always done that, and won't accept metadata does the job); meanwhile, the resource's policies are heavily against such 'decoration' and moderators often reject such. When I can't easily clone a 'coverage' area from within the same image - and feather its edges to blend in - I sometimes find another original (but slightly different viewpoint) submitted image that has a sufficiently unsullied 'patch' to let it pass muster. That's a slightly meta-example, I suppose. 141.101.99.161 23:17, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Sexual reproduction pictures on teh Interwebz mkay, but I lament a certain underrepresentation of amoeba pr0n. 141.101.105.134 08:33, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
im guessing this time traveller ^^ just came back from 2008. dont go to 2020. ever. just dont. 162.158.79.59 14:36, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Bumpf
That's a squirrel?? Look at its tail - squirrels have thick fluffy tails, not that skinny one. And if it is a squirrel, it's by far the largest I've ever seen - unless Hairbun and Cueball are children. I was 100% certain when I saw it that it was a cat. --mezimm 172.69.42.124 14:53, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- And we do know how Randall draws squirrels: 1503, 1578, 776, and 1156 all contain examples. I vote that this be changed. --mezimm 172.69.42.21 14:58, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- I'm not sure that's a cat, the muzzle looks wrong to me. Some other feline, maybe. A 4-legged furry mammal with a tail, almost definitely. Could we ask Randall for clarification? 172.69.22.132 19:45, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Looks like a rat to me. Maybe a possum or something? It has a pointed muzzle. 162.158.75.160 20:56, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Definitely an opossum or other such larger marsupial. Its muzzle is too pointed to be a cat. 162.158.75.144 02:08, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
- It looks like a large city rat to me-have you seen the proportions those rodents can get to?!?https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/giant-rat-found-in-london-gas-engineer-finds-rodent-bigger-than-a-small-child-a6925591.html 42.book.addict (talk) 21:02, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- It looks like a squirrel to me; I was shocked to see it being described as a cat. It doesn't have pointed ears! The tail is also in a classic squirrel position, and while it's admittedly thin for a squirrel, that may be a stylistic choice - it's still three times the thickness of the humans' arms. 162.158.33.196 15:27, 22 July 2024 (UTC)