Difference between revisions of "3205: Carbon Dating"
(→Explanation) |
(that wasn't the punchline) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
{{incomplete|This page was created recently by a WOODEN PICKAXE. Don't remove this notice too soon.}} | {{incomplete|This page was created recently by a WOODEN PICKAXE. Don't remove this notice too soon.}} | ||
Carbon dating is a method for determining the age of an object containing organic material by using the properties of radiocarbon, a radioactive isotope of carbon. This method is commonly used by archeologists and is invaluable in terms of predicting the time an piece of organic matter came from, like fossils. | Carbon dating is a method for determining the age of an object containing organic material by using the properties of radiocarbon, a radioactive isotope of carbon. This method is commonly used by archeologists and is invaluable in terms of predicting the time an piece of organic matter came from, like fossils. | ||
| − | The punchline of this omic stems from the fact that carbon in the universe was created in the first round of stars fusing elements, and thus a cosmologist | + | The punchline of this omic stems from the fact that carbon in the universe was created in the first round of stars fusing elements, and thus a cosmologist's only conclusion from the presence of carbon in a skeleton is "this skeleton is less than 13.6 billion years old", which is not useful information for judging artifacts found on Earth (a planet which is less than ''5'' billion years old). |
==Transcript== | ==Transcript== | ||
Revision as of 06:01, 10 February 2026
| Carbon Dating |
 Title text: This dating is corroborated by the presence of stone tools at the site, rather than earlier and less effective helium ones. |
Explanation
|
This is one of 62 incomplete explanations: This page was created recently by a WOODEN PICKAXE. Don't remove this notice too soon. If you can fix this issue, edit the page! |
Carbon dating is a method for determining the age of an object containing organic material by using the properties of radiocarbon, a radioactive isotope of carbon. This method is commonly used by archeologists and is invaluable in terms of predicting the time an piece of organic matter came from, like fossils. The punchline of this omic stems from the fact that carbon in the universe was created in the first round of stars fusing elements, and thus a cosmologist's only conclusion from the presence of carbon in a skeleton is "this skeleton is less than 13.6 billion years old", which is not useful information for judging artifacts found on Earth (a planet which is less than 5 billion years old).
Transcript
|
This is one of 43 incomplete transcripts: Don't remove this notice too soon. If you can fix this issue, edit the page! |
- [Ponytail, standing, is pointing at a blackboard containing a drawing of a skull and some bones/bone fragments, as well as a graph and some lines of text. She is speaking to Cueball and Megan, who are standing beside her.]
- Ponytail: The high carbon content of the skeleton indicates that the individual lived less than 13.6 billion years ago, after the first round of stellar nucleosynthesis.
- [Caption below the panel:]
- Cosmologist carbon dating
Add comment 
Create topic (use sparingly) 
Refresh Discussion
F10st p0st! 185.36.194.156 04:45, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
- First explanation! Hopefully it's fine... (also, nice TCMP reference.)--Utdtutyabthsc (talk) 06:00, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
- Oh, was that a deliberate reference? Why isn't it spelled the same way? What does "F10st" even mean? Elizium23 (talk) 06:58, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
- Semi-deliberate, but more spirit of the law than letter of the law since early internet trolling is (was?) a common theme here anyways lol; the 0 was a typo 185.36.194.156 10:04, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
- It is though getting a little tiresome and repeatable that someone has begun writing first post on all talk pages... Please stop it ;-) --Kynde (talk) 13:19, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
- 31Gth!!! 82.13.184.33 14:54, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
- It is though getting a little tiresome and repeatable that someone has begun writing first post on all talk pages... Please stop it ;-) --Kynde (talk) 13:19, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
- Semi-deliberate, but more spirit of the law than letter of the law since early internet trolling is (was?) a common theme here anyways lol; the 0 was a typo 185.36.194.156 10:04, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
- Oh, was that a deliberate reference? Why isn't it spelled the same way? What does "F10st" even mean? Elizium23 (talk) 06:58, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
I'm all for carbon dating, but I wouldn't want one to marry my sister. 24.123.140.66 13:52, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
Is the skeleton being studied a cosmologist? 2605:A601:80AF:4000:2A74:9789:42F0:2275 14:35, 10 February 2026 (UTC) Add comment
