3035: Trimix

Trimix

|< < Prev #3035 (January 8, 2025) Next > >|

Title text: You don't want the nitrogen percentage to be too high or you run the risk of eutrophication.

|< < Prev Random Explanation Next > >|

Explanation

Trimix is a gas used in scuba tanks that consists of oxygen, helium, and nitrogen. Trimix comes in some standard ratios between the component gases, depending on the required diving depth, for example 21/35/44 (percentage oxygen/helium/nitrogen), 18/45/37, and 15/55/30 for increasing depth. The decreasing amount of oxygen is necessary in order to prevent oxygen toxicity, and the decreasing amount of nitrogen is necessary to minimize nitrogen's narcotic effects at greater depths. Helium has proven to be a safe choice to fill the gap.

Helium gas is famously lighter than air. At standard temperature and pressure, air weighs approximately 1.28 g/L, while helium weighs only approximately 0.18 g/L. This means that a helium balloon has a lifting force of about one gram per litre, and in the comic this is humourously depicted as being enough to lift the diver off the ground.

Scuba tanks vary in size, but a large back-mounted tank, of the type shown, would likely be no larger than 22 L. This would lead to a lifting force of approximately 24 grams. In real life this would not even budge the tank itself, which would weigh over 10 kg, let alone the diver. The scenario is even less plausible because scuba tanks are highly pressurized, making the helium much heavier than unpressurized air.

The title text asserts that a trimix diver whose gas mix contains an excess of nitrogen runs "the risk of eutrophication". The term eutrophication describes the process by which nutrients ("fertilizers") accumulate in an environment, typically a body of water, leading to negative consequences. This would not happen in the human body, however, since it has mechanisms to prevent this accumulation. Furthermore, eutrophication is caused by "fixed" nitrogen, not the diatomic elemental nitrogen used in trimix.

Another interpretation of the title text is that if a diver dies of nitrogen exposure, then their dead body might cause eutrophication in the body of water in which they were swimming.

Randall addressed the question "how much helium is needed to lift a human body" in a what if? article, Falling With Helium. Helium has also featured in comics 585: Outreach, 2766: Helium Reserve and 2972: Helium Synthesis.

Transcript

[In a single frame five images of Cueball are shown as a kind of a cartoon event sequence, from left to right, with each image a later time in the process. The first image shows Cueball standing by the shore of a body of water. He is wearing scuba gear, goggles, a regulator, a scuba tank with a small H logo on it on his back, and fins, which almost touch the water.]

[In the next four images he has the same equipment on, but with changes. He is presumably still at the edge of the water, but the water is not drawn in the next four images.]

[In the second image, Cueball's scuba tank is beginning to float upwards, so the end that is not tethered to Cueball moves out and up, as shown with three small lines beneath the tank.]

[In the third image the scuba tank is now floating above Cueball's head and the strings pull his arms a bit upwards. Cueball has turned his head looking up at the tank floating above and behind his head. Again three small lines beneath the tank indicates it is moving upwards.]

[In the fourth image Cueball is now being lifted up, so his feet are now off the ground and he is tilting forward. The tank is now pointing its bottom almost straight up and Cueball is looking down with his arms out to each side as the tank pulls him up. Two lines on either side of the tank indicate that it now wobbles above him as it lifts him up.]

[In the fifth and last image the scuba tank is now pulling a dangling Cueball with his legs splayed high above the ground, above his head's height in the first image. The tank is now turned so it points its bottom to the left with lines on either side indicating wobbling motion. Cueball is floating in a roughly horizontal position as the tank's straps pull him upwards. At this point he yells:]

Cueball: Help!

[Caption below the panel:]

Trimix scuba divers need to be careful not to let the helium percentage get too high.

  Add comment        Create topic (use sparingly)       Refresh 

Discussion

The 'standard' and '2x' sized images had unexpected sizes, so an imagesize parameter has been added to render the image consistently with other comics on this website. See the web archive for more details. --TheusafBOT (talk) 05:15, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

yeah, the image on xkcd.com looks comically large for me, and I think this might be related to this. 172.69.155.86 15:50, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Not for me. I’m on Safari, and it looks pretty normal. 42.book.addict^{Talk to me!} 16:08, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

I'm on Chrome and it looks much larger than usual. .-. --1234231587678 (talk) 16:50, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Well, I'm also on Chrome, and it looks totally normal. Normal size on Edge too. RadiantRainwing (talk) 14:35, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

"Comically large"? If anything, the regular size is comically small. Why doesn't randall post comics in HD like everyone else? 141.101.109.167 20:15, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Because it's stick figures and thus unnecessary. Also, (at least on chrome) the image is so large that it overflows the boundaries. Likely a glitch, but maybe a pun, yeah. Stallman (talk) 04:53, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

XKCD is more than just stick figures, and what exactly are the boundaries? They should be at least 1920x1080. Just how large was the "glitched" image? 141.101.109.167 20:31, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

I thought the "over-inflated" image was part of the pun... - 172.70.210.177 17:48, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

It's a glitch. If it was part of the comic, it would appear oversized on all devices and screen sizes. To me it's looking normal on firefox for android, but oversized on firefox flatpak on a 1366px width monitor. 172.70.140.242 18:34, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Whatever size it is, it will, by its nature, be comically so.172.68.186.132 09:25, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

I'd question whether you could get a scuba tank to float with any amount of helium. Since you're dealing with a fixed size tank the most lift you going to get would be less than the weight of the air that the tank displaces (lift = weight of air - weight of tank - weight of helium, iirc). A typical aluminum Ali 80 tank has a volume of 11.1 liters which displaces only about 151g of air while the tank itself weighs 14kg StumbleRunner (talk) 07:17, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Now that you mention it ... I was distracted from the practicalities by the voice of Marvin the Martian running around in my head. Something about an earth-shattering kaboom. 172.71.151.165 07:33, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Yes of course a SCUBA tank cannot create any float since it cannot change it's volume (except when exploding). This is the reason why it would not work. No matter how much helium is compressed (that it it the problem the gas is compressed!) inside it. I have added this, and are not sure the text beneath this makes any sense. Someone deleted my addition but I hope this was a case of edit conflict they did not care to resolve, rather than they deleted it on purpose!? --Kynde (talk) 08:11, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

I think, on revue, I happened to restore anything you thought lost (albeit in my words, not yet knowing what you'd done) when correcting/removing the awkward misunderstanding that helium is "anti-gravity" in the 'true explanation' bit. (Yes, it's the conceit of the comic, but should not then have been used in the genuine bit of the Explanation. You only become more buoyant if you have less weight in a given volume. For an effectively unchanging volume, more of even a lighter gas is heavier. And you can never have little enough of any gas to make a Scuba-tank buoyant at sea-level air pressures.) 172.70.90.118 11:13, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

I cannot say if it was you who did this, I do not think so, since yo wrote several hours later here, and in both you comments case and the case where something was deleted it is different IP addressees. But the current explanation has taken the gist of what I intended and made it much better, so I'm happy with the current explanation which is much better than my attempt ;-) --Kynde (talk) 08:23, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Oh, I (above IP, whatever I now appear as) never claimed the fault of wiping out your prior effort, and still don't. I'd gone back to check what you might have lost out on, and but my first reading/writing of it had only ever been later. ;) I haven't taken note of the respective IPs (there's some flexibility of assignment, even moment to moment, but also a degree of geographic clustering that differentiates some of us from all but a few of the rest of us 'anons'), but I like that it at least superficially bears out my innocence in that matter.

However, it's gratifying to know that one's small contribution (amongst all the other worthy ones, equally creditable) should be appreciated. It's by many stochastic improvements that all decent articles are eventuallg formed. :p 172.70.162.164 12:20, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

There is no question here. Boyancy is provided by making the container (the tank in this example) lighter for its volume than the equivalent amount of air. With a balloon, the container volume increasaes as you increase the helium, making the container more boyant. A tank does not expand, and thus gets less boyant as increased helium adds to its mass per volume. The very best that you could do would be to fill the tank with a vacuum, but even then it would still weight more than the equivalent amount of air due to the weight of the tank itself.Geek Prophet (talk) 18:04, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Trimix is also the name of one of the strongest injectible erectile dysfunction drugs. This was my first thought when I saw the comic title. Even after I recognized my error I half expected a double-entendre on "inflation".Geek Prophet (talk) 18:07, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

When I first found the comic and googled “trimix”, the school Securly filter blocked it because of that exact reason. It was only when I switched to my personal computer that I realised my mistake. 42.book.addict^{Talk to me!} 21:31, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

That's the Scunthorpe Problem, for ya... ;) 172.70.85.70 22:51, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Won’t breathing too much helium cause Inert gas asphyxiation/suffocation? 42.book.addict^{Talk to me!} 21:55, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

yes. yes it will. However, when breathing at depth, there is the around the same partial pressure of oxygen as in the atmosphere at the surface, so you breathe it just fine as the oxygen will diffuse into your lungs just the same without the risk of oxygen toxicity. The helium just acts as a filler gas, acting to also reduce the risk of nitrogen narcosis by reducing the partial pressure of nitrogen, and is chosen because it is easy to breathe because it is light. consequently, mixtures with low amounts of oxygen are not safe to breathe closer to the surface as there is not a high enough partial pressure of oxygen to support consciousness. (i know i just told you information you could have gotten from simply reading the wikipedia article yourself guess who (if you desire conversing | what i have done) 07:06, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
        Add comment